ArticleCureus2023
A Study of Drug Utilization Pattern and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Immunosuppressant Drugs in Patients With Skin Disorders in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bihar.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims The cost-effective therapy of immunosuppressant drugs in dermatological conditions will not only lead to adherence to rational prescribing but will also increase patient compliance with fewer dropouts due to cost factor. Thus, this study was done to determine and compare the drug utilization pattern, prescribed daily dose/defined daily dose (PDD/DDD) defined by WHO, and the cost-effectiveness ratio of different immunosuppressants. Methods and material Prescriptions for patients with skin disorders prescribed with any one systematic or topical immunosuppressant were collected. The utilization of drugs in different skin disorders was expressed as frequency and percentage. PDD was compared with DDD as per the WHOCC-Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC)/DDD index. The pharmacoeconomic analysis was done using a cost-effectiveness ratio. Statistical analysis Descriptive statistics were used to calculate percentages, frequency, and 95% CI. The cost-effectiveness ratio in terms of SFDs (symptom-free days) was defined as the total cost of the initial antibiotic during the study period divided by the number of SFDs (cost/ SFD) and was expressed as mean±standard deviation, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine statistical significance of difference. Results Immunosuppressants were prescribed in 117 (19.12%) prescriptions out of a total of 612 prescriptions. Deflazacort was the most utilized systemic immunosuppressant prescribed in 27.18% of cases and was commonly prescribed for irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) followed by prednisolone and betamethasone. Tacrolimus was the most utilized topical immunosuppressant prescribed in 15.90% of patients and was commonly used for ICD and vitiligo followed by clobetasol and mometasone. Betamethasone, prednisolone, clobetasol, and mometasone had better cost-effectiveness. PDD/DDD of all immunosuppressants was less than one except prednisolone, which had a PDD/DDD ratio of 3.52. Conclusions The cost-effectiveness of steroids has the advantage of providing better patients' adherence to pharmacotherapy, but over-prescribing could also lead to long-term adverse effects of steroids. Pharmacovigilance research should also incorporate pharmacoeconomic analysis to determine the relation between these two aspects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.