ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
A vendor-agnostic, PACS integrated, and DICOM-compatible software-server pipeline for testing segmentation algorithms within the clinical radiology workflow.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mamba-based brain tumor segmentation of incomplete multi-modal MR images.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Implementing an Artificial Intelligence Decision Support System in Radiology: Prospective Qualitative Evaluation Study Using the Nonadoption Abandonment Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) Framework.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- From performance to practice: knowledge-distilled segmentator for on-premises clinical workflows.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for abdominopelvic trauma imaging: trends, gaps, and future directions.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in emergency and trauma radiology: ASER AI/ML expert panel Delphi consensus statement on research guidelines, practices, and priorities.Emergency radiology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning Models in Predicting Glioma Molecular Markers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence applied in identifying left ventricular walls in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: Pilot study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Computed Tomography Radiomics Nomogram to Predict the Intraoperative Hypertensive Crisis of Abdominal Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- An ASER AI/ML expert panel formative user research study for an interpretable interactive splenic AAST grading graphical user interface prototype.Emergency radiology · 2024Article
- Pilot deployment of a cloud-based universal medical image repository in a large public health system: A protocol study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Pulmonary contusion: automated deep learning-based quantitative visualization.Emergency radiology · 2023Article
- Accelerating voxelwise annotation of cross-sectional imaging through AI collaborative labeling with quality assurance and bias mitigation.Frontiers in radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Reproducible approaches are needed to bring AI/ML for medical image analysis closer to the bedside. Investigators wishing to shadow test cross-sectional medical imaging segmentation algorithms on new studies in real-time will benefit from simple tools that integrate PACS with on-premises image processing, allowing visualization of DICOM-compatible segmentation results and volumetric data at the radiology workstation. Purpose: In this work, we develop and release a simple containerized and easily deployable pipeline for shadow testing of segmentation algorithms within the clinical workflow. Methods: Our end-to-end automated pipeline has two major components- 1. A router/listener and anonymizer and an OHIF web viewer backstopped by a DCM4CHEE DICOM query/retrieve archive deployed in the virtual infrastructure of our secure hospital intranet, and 2. An on-premises single GPU workstation host for DICOM/NIfTI conversion steps, and image processing. DICOM images are visualized in OHIF along with their segmentation masks and associated volumetry measurements (in mL) using DICOM SEG and structured report (SR) elements. Since nnU-net has emerged as a widely-used out-of-the-box method for training segmentation models with state-of-the-art performance, feasibility of our pipleine is demonstrated by recording clock times for a traumatic pelvic hematoma nnU-net model. Results: Mean total clock time from PACS send by user to completion of transfer to the DCM4CHEE query/retrieve archive was 5 min 32 s (± SD of 1 min 26 s). This compares favorably to the report turnaround times for whole-body CT exams, which often exceed 30 min, and illustrates feasibility in the clinical setting where quantitative results would be expected prior to report sign-off. Inference times accounted for most of the total clock time, ranging from 2 min 41 s to 8 min 27 s. All other virtual and on-premises host steps combined ranged from a minimum of 34 s to a maximum of 48 s. Conclusion: The software worked seamlessly with an existing PACS and could be used for deployment of DL models within the radiology workflow for prospective testing on newly scanned patients. Once configured, the pipeline is executed through one command using a single shell script. The code is made publicly available through an open-source license at "https://github.com/vastc/," and includes a readme file providing pipeline config instructions for host names, series filter, other parameters, and citation instructions for this work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.