Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37954527›Full record

ArticleICMHI 2021 : 2021 5th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics : May 14-16, 2021, Kyoto, Japan. International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics (5th : 2021 : Online)2021

Causal AI with Real World Data: Do Statins Protect from Alzheimer's Disease Onset?

Mattia Prosperi, Marco Salemi, Shantanu Ghosh, Tianchen Lyu, Jiang Bian, Zhaoyi Chen, Jinying Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ICMHI 2021 : 2021 5th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics : May 14-16, 2021, Kyoto, Japan. International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics (5th : 2021 : Online), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Artificial intelligence for dementia prevention.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mattia ProsperiDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Florida.
Marco SalemiDepartment of Pathology, University of Florida.
Shantanu GhoshDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Florida.
Tianchen LyuDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida.
Jiang BianDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida.
Zhaoyi ChenDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida.
Jinying ZhaoDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Florida.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
The benefits and harms of lung cancer screening in FloridaR01CA246418 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2020 to 2023
$1.7M
Using Electronic Health Records from a Large Clinical Data Research Network to Understand Cancer Burden and Cancer Risks Among Transgender and Gender Nonconforming (TGNC) IndividualsR21CA245858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2020 to 2021
$773k
Optimizing the Population Representativeness of Older Adults in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia Clinical TrialsR21AG068717 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2020 to 2021
$419k
ACL HHS U18DP006512NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NCCDPHP CDC HHS U18 DP006512NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246418NCI NIH HHS R21 CA245858NIA NIH HHS R21 AG068717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Causal artificial intelligence aims at developing bias-robust models that can be used to intervene on, rather than just be predictive, of risks or outcomes. However, learning interventional models from observational data, including electronic health records (EHR), is challenging due to inherent bias, e.g., protopathic, confounding, collider. When estimating the effects of treatment interventions, classical approaches like propensity score matching are often used, but they pose limitations with large feature sets, nonlinear/nonparallel treatment group assignments, and collider bias. In this work, we used data from a large EHR consortium -OneFlorida- and evaluated causal statistical/machine learning methods for determining the effect of statin treatment on the risk of Alzheimer's disease, a debated clinical research question. We introduced a combination of directed acyclic graph (DAG) learning and comparison with expert's design, with calculation of the generalized adjustment criterion (GAC), to find an optimal set of covariates for estimation of treatment effects -ameliorating collider bias. The DAG/CAC approach was assessed together with traditional propensity score matching, inverse probability weighting, virtual-twin/counterfactual random forests, and deep counterfactual networks. We showed large heterogeneity in effect estimates upon different model configurations. Our results did not exclude a protective effect of statins, where the DAG/GAC point estimate aligned with the maximum credibility estimate, although the 95% credibility interval included a null effect, warranting further studies and replication.

Indexed as

Bayesian networkbiomedical informaticsCausal artificial intelligencedirected acyclic graphelectronic medical recordsgeneralized adjustment criterionmachine learningtreatment effect

Identifiers

PMID37954527
PMCPMC10636706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.