Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37954237›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic cutoff values for benzylpenicillin in horses to support the establishment of clinical breakpoints for benzylpenicillin antimicrobial susceptibility testing in horses.

Elodie A Lallemand, Alain Bousquet-Mélou, Laura Chapuis, Jennifer Davis, Aude A Ferran, Butch Kukanich, Taisuke Kuroda, Marlène Z Lacroix, Yohei Minamijima, Lena Olsén and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Elodie A LallemandINTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Alain Bousquet-MélouINTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Laura ChapuisINTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Jennifer DavisDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Aude A FerranINTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Butch KukanichDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Taisuke KurodaClinical Veterinary Medicine Division, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Marlène Z LacroixINTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Yohei MinamijimaDrug Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Lena OlsénDivision of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ludovic PelligandDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Felipe Ramon PortugalINTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Béatrice B RoquesINTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Elizabeth M SantschiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Katherine E WilsonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Pierre-Louis ToutainINTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRKansas State University · USVirginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine · USÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FRJapan Racing Association · JPLaboratory of Racing Chemistry · JPRoyal Veterinary College · GBSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this international project was to establish a species-specific Clinical Breakpoint for interpretation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of benzylpenicillin (BP) in horses. Methods: A population pharmacokinetic model of BP disposition was developed to compute PK/PD cutoff values of BP for different formulations that are commonly used in equine medicine around the world (France, Sweden, USA and Japan). Investigated substances were potassium BP, sodium BP, procaine BP, a combination of procaine BP and benzathine BP and penethamate, a prodrug of BP. Data were collected from 40 horses that provided 63 rich profiles of BP corresponding to a total of 1022 individual BP plasma concentrations. Results: A 3-compartment disposition model was selected. For each of these formulations, the PK/PD cutoff was estimated for different dosage regimens using Monte Carlo simulations. The Discussion: The PK/PD cutoff of 0.25 mg/L is one dilution lower than the clinical breakpoint released by the CLSI (0.5 mg/ L). From our simulations, the CLSI clinical breakpoint can be achieved with IM procaine BP twice a day at 22,000 IU i.e. 12.4 mg/kg.

Indexed as

antimicrobial susceptibility testingbenzylpenicillinhorseMonte Carlo simulationsPK/PD cutoffpopulation pharmacokineticsprobability of target attainment

Identifiers

PMID37954237
PMCPMC10634207
OpenAlexW4387940199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.