Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37954230›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2023

What is the optimal duration, dose and frequency for anti-PD1 therapy of non-small cell lung cancer?

Chii Yang Kuah, Robert Monfries, Matteo Quartagno, Michael J Seckl, Ehsan Ghorani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chii Yang KuahDepartment of Medical Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital Campus of Imperial College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2673-1499
Robert MonfriesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital Campus of Imperial College London, UK.
Matteo QuartagnoInstitute for Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
Michael J SecklDepartment of Medical Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital Campus of Imperial College London W6 8RF, UK.
Ehsan GhoraniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital Campus of Imperial College London W6 8RF, UK.
Charing Cross Hospital · GBMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the management of multiple malignancies including lung cancer. However, the optimal use of these agents in terms of duration, dose and administration frequency remains unknown. Focusing on anti-PD1 agents nivolumab and pembrolizumab in the context of non-small cell lung cancer, we argue that several lines of evidence suggest current administration regimens of these drugs may result in overtreatment with potentially important implications for cost, quality of life and toxicity. This review summarizes evidence for the scope to optimize anti-PD1 regimens, the limitations of existing data and potential approaches to solve these problems including with a novel multi-arm clinical trial design implemented in the recently opened REFINE-Lung study.

Indexed as

checkpoint inhibitordosedurationimmunotherapynon-small cell lung cancerovertreatment

Identifiers

PMID37954230
PMCPMC10638879
OpenAlexW4388578583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.