Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37954203›Full record

ArticleNational science review2023

Diverse glasses revealed from Chang'E-5 lunar regolith.

Rui Zhao, Laiquan Shen, Dongdong Xiao, Chao Chang, Yao Huang, Jihao Yu, Huaping Zhang, Ming Liu, Shaofan Zhao, Wei Yao and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Toxicity of lunar dust simulant exposure via the digestive system: Microbiota dysbiosis and multi-organ injury].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rui ZhaoInstitute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Laiquan ShenInstitute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Dongdong XiaoInstitute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Chao ChangInstitute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7882-5959
Yao HuangInstitute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Jihao YuInstitute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Huaping ZhangInstitute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Ming LiuQian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology, China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing 100094, China.
Shaofan ZhaoQian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology, China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing 100094, China.
Wei YaoQian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology, China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing 100094, China.
Zhen LuInstitute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Baoan SunInstitute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Haiyang BaiInstitute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7687-7624
Zhigang ZouQian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology, China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing 100094, China.
Mengfei YangQian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology, China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing 100094, China.
Weihua WangInstitute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Institute of Physics · CNChina Academy of Space Technology · CNSongshan Lake Materials Laboratory · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lunar glasses with different origins act as snapshots of their formation processes, providing a rich archive of the Moon's formation and evolution. Here, we reveal diverse glasses from Chang'E-5 (CE-5) lunar regolith, and clarify their physical origins of liquid quenching, vapor deposition and irradiation damage respectively. The series of quenched glasses, including rotation-featured particles, vesicular agglutinates and adhered melts, record multiple-scale impact events. Abundant micro-impact products, like micron- to nano-scale glass droplets or craters, highlight that the regolith is heavily reworked by frequent micrometeorite bombardment. Distinct from Apollo samples, the indigenous ultra-elongated glass fibers drawn from viscous melts and the widespread ultra-thin deposited amorphous rims without nanophase iron particles both indicate a relatively gentle impact environment at the CE-5 landing site. The clarification of multitype CE-5 glasses also provides a catalogue of diverse lunar glasses, meaning that more of the Moon's mysteries, recorded in glasses, could be deciphered in future.

Indexed as

amorphous rimsgentle impact environmentglass fiberslunar glassesmicrometeorite impacts

Identifiers

PMID37954203
PMCPMC10632798
OpenAlexW4353027610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.