Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37954185›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Behavioral patterns in robotic collaborative assembly: comparing neurotypical and Autism Spectrum Disorder participants.

Marta Mondellini, Pooja Prajod, Matteo Lavit Nicora, Mattia Chiappini, Ettore Micheletti, Fabio Alexander Storm, Rocco Vertechy, Elisabeth André, Matteo Malosio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marta Mondellini *Institute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing, National Research Council of Italy, Lecco, Italy.
Pooja Prajod *Department of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Matteo Lavit Nicora *Institute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing, National Research Council of Italy, Lecco, Italy.
Mattia ChiappiniScientific Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico E. Medea, Lecco, Italy.
Ettore MichelettiScientific Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico E. Medea, Lecco, Italy.
Fabio Alexander StormScientific Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico E. Medea, Lecco, Italy.
Rocco VertechyDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Elisabeth AndréDepartment of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Matteo MalosioInstitute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing, National Research Council of Italy, Lecco, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In Industry 4.0, collaborative tasks often involve operators working with collaborative robots (cobots) in shared workspaces. Many aspects of the operator's well-being within this environment still need in-depth research. Moreover, these aspects are expected to differ between neurotypical (NT) and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) operators. Methods: This study examines behavioral patterns in 16 participants (eight neurotypical, eight with high-functioning ASD) during an assembly task in an industry-like lab-based robotic collaborative cell, enabling the detection of potential risks to their well-being during industrial human-robot collaboration. Each participant worked on the task for five consecutive days, 3.5 h per day. During these sessions, six video clips of 10 min each were recorded for each participant. The videos were used to extract quantitative behavioral data using the NOVA annotation tool and analyzed qualitatively using an Results: The two groups differ mainly regarding behavior (e.g., prioritizing the robot partner, gaze patterns, facial expressions, multi-tasking, and personal space), adaptation to the task over time, and the resulting overall performance. Discussion: This result confirms that NT and ASD participants in a collaborative shared workspace have different needs and that the working experience should be tailored depending on the end-user's characteristics. The findings of this study represent a starting point for further efforts to promote well-being in the workplace. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work comparing NT and ASD participants in a collaborative industrial scenario.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum Disorderbehavior analysishuman-robot collaborationIndustry 4.0joint activitywellbeing

Identifiers

PMID37954185
PMCPMC10637657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.