ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023
Teaching STEAM in the shaolin staff program: ways to stimulate student engagement in learning.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Kinetic characteristics of Wushu Changbing PiJi: decoupling sex-specific adaptive strategies via functional principal component analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the advancement of technology and change in education concepts, applying STEAM pedagogy to physical education has become an innovative trend. This study investigates whether physics analysis based on STEAM concepts can increase junior high students' participation in learning Shaolin Staff. Forty students were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The mean and standard deviation of age in the experimental group was 13.95 ± 0.83, and in the control group was 13.85 ± 0.81. The experimental group received STEAM teaching involving physics analysis, while the control group received conventional movement instruction. Student learning engagement was evaluated through questionnaires. Results are expected to show the experimental group being more engaged in learning. Introducing physics analysis may deepen understanding of related principles to movements. The study's results found that the scores of motivation, attention, and intention to learn independently were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.