Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37953990›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2023

Bumblebee responses to variation in pollinator-attracting traits of

Emily J Bailes, Jake Moscrop, Sarah Mitchell, Matthew Dorling, Tom Wood, Jane Thomas, Beverley J Glover

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily J BailesDepartment of Plant Sciences University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6486-7058
Jake MoscropDepartment of Plant Sciences University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7421-5563
Sarah MitchellDepartment of Plant Sciences University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.
Matthew DorlingDepartment of Plant Sciences University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.
Tom WoodNIAB Cambridge UK.
Jane ThomasNIAB Cambridge UK.
Beverley J GloverDepartment of Plant Sciences University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptations that attract pollinators to flowers are central to the reproductive success of insect-pollinated plants, including crops. Understanding the influence of these non-rewarding traits on pollinator preference is important for our future food security by maintaining sufficient crop pollination. We have identified substantial variation in flower shape, petal size, corolla-tube length, petal spot size and floral volatile compounds among a panel of 30 genetically distinct lines of

Indexed as

attractive traitsBombus terrestriscorolla‐tube lengthflower sizeVicia fabavolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID37953990
PMCPMC10638492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.