Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37953980›Full record

ReviewPatient preference and adherence2023

Bioequivalence of Different Formulations of Zonisamide Oral Suspensions: A Short Review.

Ivana Stević, Nemanja Petrović, Slobodan M Janković

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ivana StevićFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-8880-7092
Nemanja PetrovićFaculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Slobodan M JankovićFaculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-1519-8828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To satisfy the needs of pediatric and other patients with focal onset seizures who cannot swallow solid dosage forms of zonisamide, an oral liquid form of this drug is necessary in clinical practice. Although there are two oral suspensions of zonisamide with marketing authorization (MA), there are issues of availability and high cost which limit their use and inspire extemporaneous compounding. Extemporaneously compounded oral suspensions of zonisamide are prepared according to different formulas and vary in stability; therefore it is essential to test this characteristic. Bioequivalence of extemporaneously compounded oral suspensions has never been tested, and the efficacy and safety of zonisamide oral suspensions have generally not been demonstrated in clinical trials. As a narrow therapeutic window drug, zonisamide requires precision in dosing, which could be achieved only with dosage forms with established bioavailability, efficacy, and safety. In order to avoid underdosing and toxicity with zonisamide oral suspensions and utilize their full therapeutic potential, it is necessary to perform bioequivalence studies with each variation of extemporaneously compounded oral suspension and also clinical trials with both commercial and extemporaneous oral suspensions of zonisamide.

Indexed as

bioequivalenceoral suspensionstabilityzonisamide

Identifiers

PMID37953980
PMCPMC10638902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.