ArticleiScience2023
Everyone knows what behavior is but they just don't agree on it.
Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The behaviour-performance continuum: how does individual variation in locomotor abilities relate to behaviour?Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
- Differences in psychologists' cognitive traits are associated with scientific divides.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- A call for precision in the study of behaviour and decision.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- The impact of machine learning on ethological neuroscience.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025Review
- The "plant neurobiology" revolution.Plant signaling & behavior · 2024Review
- An ontological framework for organising and describing behaviours: The Human Behaviour Ontology.Wellcome open research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studying "behavior" lies at the heart of many disciplines. Nevertheless, academics rarely provide an explicit definition of what "behavior" actually is. What range of definitions do people use, and how does that vary across disciplines? To answer these questions, we have developed a survey to probe what constitutes "behavior." We find that academics adopt different definitions of behavior according to their academic discipline, animal model that they work with, and level of academic seniority. Using hierarchical clustering, we identify at least six distinct types of "behavior" which are used in seven distinct operational archetypes of "behavior." Individual respondents have clear consistent definitions of behavior, but these definitions are not consistent across the population. Our study is a call for academics to clarify what they mean by "behavior" wherever they study it, with the hope that this will foster interdisciplinary studies that will improve our understanding of behavioral phenomena.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.