Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37953908›Full record

ArticleNMC case report journal2023

Filter-type Protection Device Retrieval Interfered by Deployed Stent during Subclavian Artery Stenosis Treatment: Case Report and Complication Avoidance Recommendation.

Nobuyuki Mitsui, Manabu Kinoshita, Junji Nakazawa, Hirokazu Ozaki, Teruo Kimura

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in NMC case report journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nobuyuki MitsuiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Kitami Hospital, Kitami, Hokkaido, Japan.
Manabu KinoshitaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Junji NakazawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hokkaido Prefectural Kitami Hospital, Kitami, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hirokazu OzakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Kitami Hospital, Kitami, Hokkaido, Japan.
Teruo KimuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Kitami Hospital, Kitami, Hokkaido, Japan.
Asahikawa Medical University · JPKitami Institute of Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular treatment is a standard procedure for subclavian artery stenosis or obstruction. However, great care should be taken to avoid embolic complications to the vertebral artery, and several methods have previously been reported. Hence, as surgical procedures become increasingly complicated, unintended issues may arise during treatment. Here, the authors report a case where the filter-type protection device was caught in the stent because the patient moved during treatment, leading to open surgery to recover the filter-type protection device. A 78-year-old female suffering from a left subclavian steal syndrome underwent stenting due to subclavian artery stenosis. The stenotic lesion was approached via the transfemoral route, and a filter-type protection device was advanced to the vertebral artery via the transbrachial route to prevent embolic complications. As the procedure was performed under local anesthesia, the patient moved during stent deployment proximally to the left vertebral artery origin, and the stent unintentionally advanced distally, covering the vertebral artery and obstructing the retrieval catheter for the filter-type protection device to advance. Failed attempts in recovering the filter-type protection device required open surgery for retrieval. Fortunately, there was no postoperative neurological and radiographic complication, ameliorating her chief complaint. The retriever catheter for the protection device should be advanced beyond the vertebral artery orifice just proximal to the protection device before stenting to avoid such complications while also thoroughly considering the type of anesthesia during treatment..

Indexed as

complicationendovascular surgeryfilter-type protection deviceprotectionsubclavian artery stenosis

Identifiers

PMID37953908
PMCPMC10635904
OpenAlexW4387629396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.