ArticleBJR open2023
Clinical impact of 99mTc-HDP SPECT/CT imaging as standard workup for foot and ankle osteoarthritis.
Article in BJR open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The use of SPECT-CT in the evaluation of lumbar spine pathology - A Narrative Review.Brain & spine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The primary aim of this study was to assess to what extent 99mTc-HDP Single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) will lead to change of diagnosis and treatment, in patients with suspected foot and ankle osteoarthritis (OA). Secondary aim was to assess the intraobserver variability. Methods: Retrospectively 107 patients, with suspected foot and/or ankle OA of which a SPECT/CT was made, were included for analysis. All the clinical and radiological data were randomized and blinded before being scored by one experienced orthopaedic surgeon. Firstly, based on the clinical data and conventional radiographs, a diagnosis and treatment plan was scored. Secondly, the observer accessed the SPECT/CT and could change the diagnosis and treatment plan. Additionally, the intraobserver reliability was determined by data of 18 patients that were added in twofold to the dataset, without awareness of the observer and by calculating the κ values. Results: The diagnosis changed in 53% (57/107) and treatment plans changed in 26% (28/107) of the patients. Intraobserver reliability for the conventional workup was Conclusions: This study describes the influence of SPECT/CT on diagnosis and treatment plans in patients with suspected symptomatic OA. Also, it shows SPECT/CT leads to a higher intraobserver variability. We believe SPECT/CT has a promising role in the workup for foot and ankle OA. Advances in knowledge: In addition to what was found in complex foot and ankle cases, this study shows that in patients with non-complex foot and ankle problems, SPECT/CT has a substantial influence on the diagnosis (and subsequent treatment plan).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.