Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37953833›Full record

ReviewACS omega2023

Quality Standards and Pharmacological Interventions of Natural Oils: Current Scenario and Future Perspectives.

Shadab Ali, Rustam Ekbbal, Sapna Salar, Yasheshwar, Sayad Ahad Ali, Aakash Kumar Jaiswal, Mhaveer Singh, Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Santosh Kumar, Gaurav

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Phytochemical Analysis and Antimicrobial Potential ofRecent patents on biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shadab AliIIMT College of Medical Sciences, IIMT University, O Pocket, Ganga Nagar, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250001, India.
Rustam EkbbalIIMT College of Medical Sciences, IIMT University, O Pocket, Ganga Nagar, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250001, India.
Sapna SalarBBDIT College of Pharmacy, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201206, India.
YasheshwarDepartment of Botany, Acharya Narendra Dev College (University of Delhi), Govindpuri, Kalkaji, New Delhi 110019, India.
Sayad Ahad AliIIMT College of Medical Sciences, IIMT University, O Pocket, Ganga Nagar, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250001, India.
Aakash Kumar JaiswalSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, IIMT University, O Pocket, Ganga Nagar, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250001, India.
Mhaveer SinghPharmacy Academy, IFTM University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh 244102, India.
Dinesh Kumar YadavDepartment of Pharmacognosy, SGT College of Pharmacy, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana 122505, India.
Santosh KumarDepartment of Botany, Maharaja Bijli Paasi Government Post Graduate College, Sector M, Ashiyana, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226012, India.
GauravIIMT College of Medical Sciences, IIMT University, O Pocket, Ganga Nagar, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250001, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0530-0788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicinal plants are rich sources of natural oils such as essential and fixed oils used traditionally for nutritive as well as medicinal purposes. Most of the traditional formulations or phytopharmaceutical formulations contain oil as the main ingredient due to their own therapeutic applications and thus mitigating several pathogeneses such as fungal/bacterial/viral infection, gout, psoriasis, analgesic, antioxidant, skin infection, etc. Due to the lack of quality standards and progressive adulteration in the natural oils, their therapeutic efficacy is continuously deteriorated. To develop quality standards and validate scientific aspects on essential oils, several chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques such as HPTLC, HPLC, NMR, LC-MS, and GC-MS have been termed as the choices of techniques for better exploration of metabolites, hence sustaining the authenticity of the essential oils. In this review, chemical profiling and quality control aspects of essential or fixed oils have been explored from previously reported literature in reputed journals. Methods of chemical profiling, possible identified metabolites in essential oils, and their therapeutic applications have been described. The outcome of the review reveals that GC-MS/MS, LC-MS/MS, and NMR-based chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques are the most liable, economic, precise, and accurate techniques for determining the spuriousness or adulteration of oils based on their qualitative and quantitative chemical profiling studies. This review occupies the extensive information about the quality standards of several oils obtained from natural sources for their regulatory aspects via providing the detailed methods used in chemoprofiling techniques. Hence, this review helps researchers in further therapeutic exploration as well as quality-based standardization for their regulatory purpose.

Identifiers

PMID37953833
PMCPMC10635672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.