ArticlePediatric radiology2024
Deeplasia: deep learning for bone age assessment validated on skeletal dysplasias.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated segmentation and length measurement of metacarpal and phalangeal bones for hand radiograph evaluation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quantifying human variability in pediatric bone age assessment: a multi-institutional multi-reader study and benchmark for AI evaluation.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning, Large Language Models, and Multimodal AI for Diagnosing Pediatric Rare Diseases: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- External Validation of Deeplasia for Automated Bone Age Assessment Compared with Four Commercial AI Systems.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Current applications and challenges of artificial intelligence applied to diagnostics in pediatric musculoskeletal imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for pediatric rare disease diagnosis: a multimethod study integrating published evidence and clinician interviews.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Bone age assessment: comparative analysis of Greulich-Pyle and Tanner-Whitehouse 3 by pediatric radiologists and endocrinologists.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Transfer Learning From Hand-Trained Deep Learning Models to Estimate Bone Age From Knee Radiographs.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Orthopaedics.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2026Review
- The CrescNet Registry Achondroplasia Module: Real-World Demographic Data and Clinical Outcomes in Untreated and Vosoritide-Treated Individuals.Hormone research in paediatrics · 2026Article
- Automated bone age assessment in rare pediatric growth disorders: a comparative study using Deeplasia.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- A developmental stage-aware graph transformer framework for automated bone-age assessment.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Automated Bone Age Assessment and Adult Height Prediction from Pediatric Hand Radiographs via a Cascaded Deep Learning Framework.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- AI in Pediatric Spine Care: Clinical, Research, and Ethical Considerations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Perspectives on the Current and Future State of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Genetics.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2025Review
- Population-specific calibration and validation of an open-source bone age AI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of BoneXpert and IB-Lab-PANDA automated Bone Age Evaluation in Children With Growth and Puberty Disorders.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for diagnosing rare bone diseases: a global survey of healthcare professionals.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Orthopedics: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in clinical genetics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSkeletal dysplasias collectively affect a large number of patients worldwide. Most of these disorders cause growth anomalies. Hence, evaluating skeletal maturity via the determination of bone age (BA) is a useful tool. Moreover, consecutive BA measurements are crucial for monitoring the growth of patients with such disorders, especially for timing hormonal treatment or orthopedic interventions. However, manual BA assessment is time-consuming and suffers from high intra- and inter-rater variability. This is further exacerbated by genetic disorders causing severe skeletal malformations. While numerous approaches to automate BA assessment have been proposed, few are validated for BA assessment on children with skeletal dysplasias.
objectiveWe present Deeplasia, an open-source prior-free deep-learning approach designed for BA assessment specifically validated on patients with skeletal dysplasias. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe trained multiple convolutional neural network models under various conditions and selected three to build a precise model ensemble. We utilized the public BA dataset from the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) consisting of training, validation, and test subsets containing 12,611, 1,425, and 200 hand and wrist radiographs, respectively. For testing the performance of our model ensemble on dysplastic hands, we retrospectively collected 568 radiographs from 189 patients with molecularly confirmed diagnoses of seven different genetic bone disorders including achondroplasia and hypochondroplasia. A subset of the dysplastic cohort (149 images) was used to estimate the test-retest precision of our model ensemble on longitudinal data.
resultsThe mean absolute difference of Deeplasia for the RSNA test set (based on the average of six different reference ratings) and dysplastic set (based on the average of two different reference ratings) were 3.87 and 5.84 months, respectively. The test-retest precision of Deeplasia on longitudinal data (2.74 months) is estimated to be similar to a human expert.
conclusionWe demonstrated that Deeplasia is competent in assessing the age and monitoring the development of both normal and dysplastic bones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.