ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024
Two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging cardiac motion-based quantitative evaluation of global longitudinal strain among patients with coronary Heart Disease and functions of left ventricular ischemic myocardial segment.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of a diagnostic nomogram to predict significant stenosis of the left anterior descending branch of the coronary artery by stress echocardiography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Transforming Heart Failure Management: The Power of Strain Imaging, 3D Imaging, and Vortex Analysis in Echocardiography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (2D-STI)-based quantitative evaluation of the influences of different levels of coronary artery stenosis on left ventricular functions and its clinical diagnostic values, 120 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) were divided into control group (30 cases), mild stenosis group (30 cases), moderate stenosis group (30 cases), and severe stenosis group (30 cases) according to coronary angiography (CAG) results. They underwent routine ultrasound examination and 2D-STI examination. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of different levels of coronary artery stenosis. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) of left ventricular myocardium among patients in moderate and severe stenosis groups remarkably declined (P < 0.05). Global radial strain (GRS) and global circular strain (GCS) among patients in severe stenosis group dramatically reduced (P < 0.05). ROC curves revealed that available GLS=-17.2 was the cut-off value for screening moderate coronary stenosis. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) amounted to 57.3%, 58.4%, and 0.573, respectively. GLS, GRS, and GCS could be used to screen severe coronary stenosis. When GLS=-16.5 was the cut-off value for screening severe coronary stenosis, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC amounted to 84.3%, 82.5%, and 0.893, respectively. With the aggravation of stenosis, left ventricular systolic function of CHD patients was impaired more significantly. 2D-STI technique could be adopted for the quantitative evaluation of left ventricular strain of patients with coronary stenosis and provided a new method for early clinical diagnosis of CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.