ArticleNucleic acids research2023
Decoding dissociation of sequence-specific protein-DNA complexes with non-equilibrium simulations.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- MDNA : a software module for DNA structure generation and analysis.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Adaptation of DNA to Protein Binding Revealed by Spectroscopy and Molecular Simulation.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Multisite λ-Dynamics for Protein-DNA Binding Affinity Prediction.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Future Directions of the Prokaryotic Chromosome Field.Molecular microbiology · 2025Article
- Enhanced Disease Resistance Mechanism of the CmoAP2/ERF Transcription Factor in Pumpkin through Genetic Mutations.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Bacterial chromatin proteins, transcription, and DNA topology: Inseparable partners in the control of gene expression.Molecular microbiology · 2024Review
- Deciphering Sequence-Specific DNA Binding by H-NS Using Molecular Simulation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sequence-specific protein-DNA interactions are crucial in processes such as DNA organization, gene regulation and DNA replication. Obtaining detailed insights into the recognition mechanisms of protein-DNA complexes through experiments is hampered by a lack of resolution in both space and time. Here, we present a molecular simulation approach to quantify the sequence specificity of protein-DNA complexes, that yields results fast, and is generally applicable to any protein-DNA complex. The approach is based on molecular dynamics simulations in combination with a sophisticated steering potential and results in an estimate of the free energy difference of dissociation. We provide predictions of the nucleotide specific binding affinity of the minor groove binding Histone-like Nucleoid Structuring (H-NS) protein, that are in agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, our approach offers mechanistic insight into the process of dissociation. Applying our approach to the major groove binding ETS domain in complex with three different nucleotide sequences identified the high affinity consensus sequence, quantitatively in agreement with experiments. Our protocol facilitates quantitative prediction of protein-DNA complex stability, while also providing high resolution insights into recognition mechanisms. As such, our simulation approach has the potential to yield detailed and quantitative insights into biological processes involving sequence-specific protein-DNA interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.