ArticleNucleic acids research2023
Exploiting public databases of genomic variation to quantify evolutionary constraint on the branch point sequence in 30 plant and animal species.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unraveling branch point-driven SR45a splicing dynamics in heat stress for plant adaptation.Science advances · 2026Article
- RNA-DNA differences in variant calls from cattle tissues result in erroneous eQTLs.BMC genomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The branch point sequence is a degenerate intronic heptamer required for the assembly of the spliceosome during pre-mRNA splicing. Disruption of this motif may promote alternative splicing and eventually cause phenotype variation. Despite its functional relevance, the branch point sequence is not included in most genome annotations. Here, we predict branch point sequences in 30 plant and animal species and attempt to quantify their evolutionary constraints using public variant databases. We find an implausible variant distribution in the databases from 16 of 30 examined species. Comparative analysis of variants from whole-genome sequencing shows that variants submitted from exome sequencing or false positive variants are widespread in public databases and cause these irregularities. We then investigate evolutionary constraint with largely unbiased public variant databases in 14 species and find that the fourth and sixth position of the branch point sequence are more constrained than coding nucleotides. Our findings show that public variant databases should be scrutinized for possible biases before they qualify to analyze evolutionary constraint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.