Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37953294›Full record

ArticleLight, science & applications2023

Universal adaptive optics for microscopy through embedded neural network control.

Qi Hu, Martin Hailstone, Jingyu Wang, Matthew Wincott, Danail Stoychev, Huriye Atilgan, Dalia Gala, Tai Chaiamarit, Richard M Parton, Jacopo Antonello and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Light, science & applications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Machine learning assisted wavefront sensor.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Intensity adaptive optics.Light, science & applications · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qi HuDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8676-2297
Martin HailstoneDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jingyu WangDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Matthew WincottDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Danail StoychevDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Huriye AtilganDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Dalia GalaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tai ChaiamaritDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Richard M PartonDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jacopo AntonelloDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5486-315X
Adam M PackerDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ilan DavisDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Martin J BoothDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. martin.booth@eng.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9525-8981
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The resolution and contrast of microscope imaging is often affected by aberrations introduced by imperfect optical systems and inhomogeneous refractive structures in specimens. Adaptive optics (AO) compensates these aberrations and restores diffraction limited performance. A wide range of AO solutions have been introduced, often tailored to a specific microscope type or application. Until now, a universal AO solution - one that can be readily transferred between microscope modalities - has not been deployed. We propose versatile and fast aberration correction using a physics-based machine learning assisted wavefront-sensorless AO control (MLAO) method. Unlike previous ML methods, we used a specially constructed neural network (NN) architecture, designed using physical understanding of the general microscope image formation, that was embedded in the control loop of different microscope systems. The approach means that not only is the resulting NN orders of magnitude simpler than previous NN methods, but the concept is translatable across microscope modalities. We demonstrated the method on a two-photon, a three-photon and a widefield three-dimensional (3D) structured illumination microscope. Results showed that the method outperformed commonly-used modal-based sensorless AO methods. We also showed that our ML-based method was robust in a range of challenging imaging conditions, such as 3D sample structures, specimen motion, low signal to noise ratio and activity-induced fluorescence fluctuations. Moreover, as the bespoke architecture encapsulated physical understanding of the imaging process, the internal NN configuration was no-longer a "black box", but provided physical insights on internal workings, which could influence future designs.

Identifiers

PMID37953294
PMCPMC10641083
OpenAlexW4388641652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.