Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37952945›Full record

ReviewInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2025

Management of Chronic Constipation: A Comprehensive Review.

Mariko Hojo, Tomoyoshi Shibuya, Akihito Nagahara

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariko HojoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Japan.
Tomoyoshi ShibuyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Japan.
Akihito NagaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Japan.
Juntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, the treatment of chronic constipation has focused on lifestyle modification, dietary guidance and therapy, and osmotic and stimulant laxatives. Recently, several drugs with new mechanisms of action have been introduced as treatments for chronic constipation. In Japan, polyethylene glycol and lactulose can now be administered under insurance coverage. The number of treatment options for constipation has increased dramatically. First, lifestyle modifications and dietary therapies must be implemented. If constipation does not improve sufficiently, specialized functional tests are performed to diagnose physiological subgroups. If functional tests are not available, patients are classified as having the "decreased frequency of defecation" type or the "difficult defecation" type based on the patient's symptoms, with treatment applied according to each type. Medical therapy includes osmotic laxatives, secretagogues, bile acid transporter inhibitors, probiotics, prokinetics, and Kampo medicines. The temporary use of stimulant laxatives, suppositories, enemas, and digital evacuation is also recommended. The usefulness of biofeedback is yet to be determined.

Indexed as

ConstipationLaxativesProbioticsChronic DiseaseHumansLactuloseLife StyleLactuloseLaxativeselobixibatlinaclotidelubiprostoneosmotic laxativesstimulant laxatives

Identifiers

PMID37952945
PMCPMC11781917
OpenAlexW4388609033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.