Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37952630›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

How greedy is too greedy? A network toy model for evaluating the sustainability of biased evolutionary dynamics.

V P Weinberger, N Zalaquett, S Abades

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. How greedy is too greedy? A network toy model for evaluating the sustainability of biased evolutionary dynamics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

V P WeinbergerCenter for Resilience, Adaptation and Mitigation (CReAM), Universidad Mayor, Temuco, 4801043, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-9693-7492
N ZalaquettPLR Physics Ludique Research, Santiago, 9761013, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-3994-3343
S AbadesGEMA Center for Genomics, Ecology & Environment, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, 8580745, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-5704-4037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern humanity has changed the biosphere at a global scale, threatening its own sustainability. It is claimed that through technology humans maximize the extraction of energy from the natural system towards their own benefit, with rates of appropriation that surpass the time-scales for systemic adaptation. This time-decoupled coevolutionary dynamic is at the core of human societal unsustainability. Here, we developed

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSustainable Growthenergy-based flowing networksenergy sequestrationnetwork toy-modelsocio-ecological systemssocio-metabolismsustainability

Identifiers

PMID37952630
PMCPMC10645075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.