Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37952619›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis.

Peter Søgaard Jørgensen, Vanessa P Weinberger, Timothy M Waring

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. What is groundwater?Hydrogeology journal · 2026
    Article
  2. The Anthropocene condition: evolving through social-ecological transformations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter Søgaard JørgensenStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Stockholm 10691, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2621-378X
Vanessa P WeinbergerCenter for Resilience, Adaptation and Mitigation (CReAM), Universidad Mayor, Temuco, 4801043, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-9693-7492
Timothy M WaringMitchell Center for Sustainability Solutions, University of Maine Orono, ME 04473, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7364-1130
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences · SEUniversidad Mayor · CLUniversity of Maine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How did human societies evolve to become a major force of global change? What dynamics can lead societies on a trajectory of global sustainability? The astonishing growth in human population, economic activity and environmental impact has brought these questions to the fore. This theme issue pulls together a variety of traditions that seek to address these questions using different theories and methods. In this Introduction, we review and organize the major strands of work on how the Anthropocene evolved, how evolutionary dynamics are influencing sustainability efforts today, and what principles, strategies and capacities will be important to guide us towards global sustainability in the future. We present a set of synthetic insights and highlight frontiers for future research efforts which could contribute to a consolidated synthesis. This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis'.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic EffectsEnvironmentHumansAnthropoceneevolutionevolvabilitysustainabilitysynthesis

Identifiers

PMID37952619
PMCPMC10645096
OpenAlexW4388617282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.