Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37952618›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Integrating evolutionary theory and social-ecological systems research to address the sustainability challenges of the Anthropocene.

Thomas E Currie, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Laurel Fogarty, Maja Schlüter, Carl Folke, L Jamila Haider, Guido Caniglia, Alessandro Tavoni, Raf E V Jansen, Peter Søgaard Jørgensen and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Characteristic processes of human evolution caused the Anthropocene and may obstruct its global solutions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thomas E CurrieHuman Behaviour and Cultural Evolution Group, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9861-1341
Monique Borgerhoff MulderDepartment of Anthropology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1117-5984
Laurel FogartyMax-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1117-5984
Maja SchlüterStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Carl FolkeBeijer Institute of Ecological Economics, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2621-378X
L Jamila HaiderStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Guido CanigliaKonrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research, A-3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Alessandro TavoniDepartment of Economics, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2057-5720
Raf E V JansenGlobal Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3169-9649
Peter Søgaard JørgensenStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4050-3281
Timothy M WaringMitchell Center for Sustainability Solutions and School of Economics, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5710, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7364-1130

Funding

NSF National Science FoundationUSDA NIFA ME022008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid, human-induced changes in the Earth system during the Anthropocene present humanity with critical sustainability challenges. Social-ecological systems (SES) research provides multiple approaches for understanding the complex interactions between humans, social systems, and environments and how we might direct them towards healthier and more resilient futures. However, general theories of SES change have yet to be fully developed. Formal evolutionary theory has been applied as a dynamic theory of change of complex phenomena in biology and the social sciences, but rarely in SES research. In this paper, we explore the connections between both fields, hoping to foster collaboration. After sketching out the distinct intellectual traditions of SES research and evolutionary theory, we map some of their terminological and theoretical connections. We then provide examples of how evolutionary theory might be incorporated into SES research through the use of systems mapping to identify evolutionary processes in SES, the application of concepts from evolutionary developmental biology to understand the connections between systems changes and evolutionary changes, and how evolutionary thinking may help design interventions for beneficial change. Integrating evolutionary theory and SES research can lead to a better understanding of SES changes and positive interventions for a more sustainable Anthropocene. This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis'.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic EffectsEcosystemSustainable GrowthAnthropoceneevolutionsocial-ecological systemstheory

Identifiers

PMID37952618
PMCPMC10645068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.