ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024
AutoCriteria: a generalizable clinical trial eligibility criteria extraction system powered by large language models.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Readiness in Clinical Trial Operations: A Narrative Review and Site-Level Governance Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Leveraging generative artificial intelligence for the development of non-interventional research study protocols: a proof-of-concept feasibility study.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Empowering clinical trial design with agentic intelligence and real-world data.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The role of AI in oncology: present applications and future horizons.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design, conduct, and analysis: a narrative review.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- Promises and challenges of applying large language models in the healthcare domain.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Use of a Generative Pretrained Transformer to Answer Questions and Facilitate a Large Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Large language models in clinical trials: applications, technical advances, and future directions.BMC medicine · 2025Review
- Large Language Models in Randomized Controlled Trials Design: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Observational
- A perspective for adapting generalist AI to specialized medical AI applications and their challenges.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Natural Language Processing in Support of Evidence-based Medicine: A Scoping Review.Findings of ACL. ACL · 2025Article
- Enhancing Patient-Trial Matching With Large Language Models: A Scoping Review of Emerging Applications and Approaches.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of the performance of the large language models ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4 and Open AI-o1 in the field of Programmed Cell Death in myeloma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Extracting Multifaceted Characteristics of Patients With Chronic Disease Comorbidity: Framework Development Using Large Language Models.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Enhancing biomarker based oncology trial matching using large language models.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- An Automatic and End-to-End System for Rare Disease Knowledge Graph Construction Based on Ontology-Enhanced Large Language Models: Development Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Illuminating the landscape of high-level clinical trial opportunities in the All of Us Research Program.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Article
- Matching patients to clinical trials with large language models.Nature communications · 2024Article
- CriteriaMapper: establishing the automatic identification of clinical trial cohorts from electronic health records by matching normalized eligibility criteria and patient clinical characteristics.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe aim to build a generalizable information extraction system leveraging large language models to extract granular eligibility criteria information for diverse diseases from free text clinical trial protocol documents. We investigate the model's capability to extract criteria entities along with contextual attributes including values, temporality, and modifiers and present the strengths and limitations of this system. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe clinical trial data were acquired from https://ClinicalTrials.gov/. We developed a system, AutoCriteria, which comprises the following modules: preprocessing, knowledge ingestion, prompt modeling based on GPT, postprocessing, and interim evaluation. The final system evaluation was performed, both quantitatively and qualitatively, on 180 manually annotated trials encompassing 9 diseases.
resultsAutoCriteria achieves an overall F1 score of 89.42 across all 9 diseases in extracting the criteria entities, with the highest being 95.44 for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and the lowest of 84.10 for breast cancer. Its overall accuracy is 78.95% in identifying all contextual information across all diseases. Our thematic analysis indicated accurate logic interpretation of criteria as one of the strengths and overlooking/neglecting the main criteria as one of the weaknesses of AutoCriteria. DISCUSSION: AutoCriteria demonstrates strong potential to extract granular eligibility criteria information from trial documents without requiring manual annotations. The prompts developed for AutoCriteria generalize well across different disease areas. Our evaluation suggests that the system handles complex scenarios including multiple arm conditions and logics.
conclusionAutoCriteria currently encompasses a diverse range of diseases and holds potential to extend to more in the future. This signifies a generalizable and scalable solution, poised to address the complexities of clinical trial application in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.