Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37952162›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

DOSE-L1000: unveiling the intricate landscape of compound-induced transcriptional changes.

Junmin Wang, Steven Novick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Junmin WangData Sciences and Quantitative Biology, Discovery Sciences, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-3728-9538
Steven NovickGlobal Statistical Sciences, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN 46285, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe LINCS L1000 project has collected gene expression profiles for thousands of compounds across a wide array of concentrations, cell lines, and time points. However, conventional analysis methods often fall short in capturing the rich information encapsulated within the L1000 transcriptional dose-response data.

resultsWe present DOSE-L1000, a database that unravels the potency and efficacy of compound-gene pairs and the intricate landscape of compound-induced transcriptional changes. Our study uses the fitting of over 140 million generalized additive models and robust linear models, spanning the complete spectrum of compounds and landmark genes within the LINCS L1000 database. This systematic approach provides quantitative insights into differential gene expression and the potency and efficacy of compound-gene pairs across diverse cellular contexts. Through examples, we showcase the application of DOSE-L1000 in tasks such as cell line and compound comparisons, along with clustering analyses and predictions of drug-target interactions. DOSE-L1000 fosters applications in drug discovery, accelerating the transition to omics-driven drug development. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DOSE-L1000 is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8286375.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryTranscriptomeHumansMCF-7 Cells

Identifiers

PMID37952162
PMCPMC10663987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.