ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2024
Evaluating dynamic and predictive discrimination for recurrent event models: use of a time-dependent C-index.
Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of a novel nutrient-based index for risk of aging using an interpretable machine learning framework: results from two population-based studies.Nutrition journal · 2025Article
- Statistical learning methods for improving predictive performance in time-dependent survival models.Genomics & informatics · 2025Article
- Investigating the Prognostic Role of Telomerase-Related Cellular Senescence Gene Signatures in Breast Cancer Using Machine Learning.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Survival path model outperforms conventional static machine learning models in long-term dynamic prognosis prediction for patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2025
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interest in analyzing recurrent event data has increased over the past few decades. One essential aspect of a risk prediction model for recurrent event data is to accurately distinguish individuals with different risks of developing a recurrent event. Although the concordance index (C-index) effectively evaluates the overall discriminative ability of a regression model for recurrent event data, a local measure is also desirable to capture dynamic performance of the regression model over time. Therefore, in this study, we propose a time-dependent C-index measure for inferring the model's discriminative ability locally. We formulated the C-index as a function of time using a flexible parametric model and constructed a concordance-based likelihood for estimation and inference. We adapted a perturbation-resampling procedure for variance estimation. Extensive simulations were conducted to investigate the proposed time-dependent C-index's finite-sample performance and estimation procedure. We applied the time-dependent C-index to three regression models of a study of re-hospitalization in patients with colorectal cancer to evaluate the models' discriminative capability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.