Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37952071›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Microbiome study of a coupled aquaponic system: unveiling the independency of bacterial communities and their beneficial influences among different compartments.

Alberto Ruiz, Daniel Scicchitano, Giorgia Palladino, Enrico Nanetti, Marco Candela, Dolors Furones, Ignasi Sanahuja, Ricard Carbó, Enric Gisbert, Karl B Andree

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alberto RuizAquaculture Program, Institute for Research and Technology in Agroalimentaries (IRTA), Ctra. Poble Nou. Km 5.5, 43540, Ràpita, Spain.
Daniel ScicchitanoUnit of Microbiome Science and Biotechnology, Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Via Belmeloro 6, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Giorgia PalladinoUnit of Microbiome Science and Biotechnology, Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Via Belmeloro 6, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Enrico NanettiUnit of Microbiome Science and Biotechnology, Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Via Belmeloro 6, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Marco CandelaUnit of Microbiome Science and Biotechnology, Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Via Belmeloro 6, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Dolors FuronesAquaculture Program, Institute for Research and Technology in Agroalimentaries (IRTA), Ctra. Poble Nou. Km 5.5, 43540, Ràpita, Spain.
Ignasi SanahujaAquaculture Program, Institute for Research and Technology in Agroalimentaries (IRTA), Ctra. Poble Nou. Km 5.5, 43540, Ràpita, Spain.
Ricard CarbóAquaculture Program, Institute for Research and Technology in Agroalimentaries (IRTA), Ctra. Poble Nou. Km 5.5, 43540, Ràpita, Spain.
Enric GisbertAquaculture Program, Institute for Research and Technology in Agroalimentaries (IRTA), Ctra. Poble Nou. Km 5.5, 43540, Ràpita, Spain. enric.gisbert@irta.cat.
Karl B AndreeAquaculture Program, Institute for Research and Technology in Agroalimentaries (IRTA), Ctra. Poble Nou. Km 5.5, 43540, Ràpita, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the microbiome composition and interplay among bacterial communities in different compartments of a coupled freshwater aquaponics system growing flathead grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) and lettuces (Lactuca sativa), 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of the V3-V4 region was analysed from each compartment (fish intestine, water from the sedimentation tank, bioballs from the biological filter, water and biofilm from the hydroponic unit, and lettuce roots). The bacterial communities of each sample group showed a stable diversity during all the trial, except for the fish gut microbiota, which displayed lower alpha diversity values. Regarding beta diversity, the structure of bacterial communities belonging to the biofilm adhering to the hydroponic tank walls, bioballs, and lettuce roots resembled each other (weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances), while bacteria from water samples also clustered together. However, both of the above-mentioned bacterial communities did not resemble those of fish gut. We found a low or almost null number of shared Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) among sampled groups which indicated that each compartment worked as an independent microbiome. Regarding fish health and food safety, the microbiome profile did not reveal neither fish pathogens nor bacterial species potentially pathogenic for food health, highlighting the safety of this sustainable food production system.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaSmegmamorphaAnimalsBacteriaFishesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWaterRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWater

Identifiers

PMID37952071
PMCPMC10640640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.