Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37952026›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

COVID-19 screening in low resource settings using artificial intelligence for chest radiographs and point-of-care blood tests.

Keelin Murphy, Josephine Muhairwe, Steven Schalekamp, Bram van Ginneken, Irene Ayakaka, Kamele Mashaete, Bulemba Katende, Alastair van Heerden, Shannon Bosman, Thandanani Madonsela and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Keelin MurphyRadboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Keelin.Murphy@Radboudumc.nl.
Josephine MuhairweSolidarMed, Partnerships for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Steven SchalekampRadboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bram van GinnekenRadboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Irene AyakakaSolidarMed, Partnerships for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Kamele MashaeteSolidarMed, Partnerships for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Bulemba KatendeSolidarMed, Partnerships for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Alastair van HeerdenCentre for Community Based Research, Human Sciences Research Council, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Shannon BosmanCentre for Community Based Research, Human Sciences Research Council, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Thandanani MadonselaCentre for Community Based Research, Human Sciences Research Council, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Lucia Gonzalez FernandezDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Aita SignorellSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Moniek BresserSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Klaus Reither *Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Tracy R Glass *Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Human Sciences Research Council · ZASwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversity Medical Center · USUniversity of Basel · CHRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems for detection of COVID-19 using chest X-Ray (CXR) imaging and point-of-care blood tests were applied to data from four low resource African settings. The performance of these systems to detect COVID-19 using various input data was analysed and compared with antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests. Participants were tested using the gold standard of RT-PCR test (nasopharyngeal swab) to determine whether they were infected with SARS-CoV-2. A total of 3737 (260 RT-PCR positive) participants were included. In our cohort, AI for CXR images was a poor predictor of COVID-19 (AUC = 0.60), since the majority of positive cases had mild symptoms and no visible pneumonia in the lungs. AI systems using differential white blood cell counts (WBC), or a combination of WBC and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) both achieved an AUC of 0.74 with a suggested optimal cut-off point at 83% sensitivity and 63% specificity. The antigen-RDT tests in this trial obtained 65% sensitivity at 98% specificity. This study is the first to validate AI tools for COVID-19 detection in an African setting. It demonstrates that screening for COVID-19 using AI with point-of-care blood tests is feasible and can operate at a higher sensitivity level than antigen testing.

Indexed as

COVID-19Artificial IntelligenceHumansLeukocyte CountPoint-of-Care SystemsSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID37952026
PMCPMC10640556
OpenAlexW4388593063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.