Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37951952›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

A genomic catalogue of soil microbiomes boosts mining of biodiversity and genetic resources.

Bin Ma, Caiyu Lu, Yiling Wang, Jingwen Yu, Kankan Zhao, Ran Xue, Hao Ren, Xiaofei Lv, Ronghui Pan, Jiabao Zhang and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
33.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bin Ma *Institute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4807-4992
Caiyu Lu *Institute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Yiling Wang *Institute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8924-2417
Jingwen YuZJU-Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center, Hangzhou, 311200, China.
Kankan ZhaoInstitute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3066-9402
Ran XueZJU-Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center, Hangzhou, 311200, China.
Hao RenZJU-Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center, Hangzhou, 311200, China.
Xiaofei LvDepartment of Environmental Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.
Ronghui PanZJU-Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center, Hangzhou, 311200, China.
Jiabao ZhangState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6922-0480
Yongguan ZhuResearch Center for Eco-environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3861-8482
Jianming XuInstitute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China. jmxu@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2954-9764
Zhejiang University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNChina Jiliang University · CNZhejiang University of Water Resource and Electric Power · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil harbors a vast expanse of unidentified microbes, termed as microbial dark matter, presenting an untapped reservo)ir of microbial biodiversity and genetic resources, but has yet to be fully explored. In this study, we conduct a large-scale excavation of soil microbial dark matter by reconstructing 40,039 metagenome-assembled genome bins (the SMAG catalogue) from 3304 soil metagenomes. We identify 16,530 of 21,077 species-level genome bins (SGBs) as unknown SGBs (uSGBs), which expand archaeal and bacterial diversity across the tree of life. We also illustrate the pivotal role of uSGBs in augmenting soil microbiome's functional landscape and intra-species genome diversity, providing large proportions of the 43,169 biosynthetic gene clusters and 8545 CRISPR-Cas genes. Additionally, we determine that uSGBs contributed 84.6% of previously unexplored viral-host associations from the SMAG catalogue. The SMAG catalogue provides an useful genomic resource for further studies investigating soil microbial biodiversity and genetic resources.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSoilBiodiversityGenomicsMetagenomeSoil MicrobiologySoil

Identifiers

PMID37951952
PMCPMC10640626
OpenAlexW4388592083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.