Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37951912›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2023

A comparative study on point cloud down-sampling strategies for deep learning-based crop organ segmentation.

Dawei Li, Yongchang Wei, Rongsheng Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Deep learning for three-dimensional (3D) plant phenomics.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dawei LiEngineering Research Center of Digitized Textile and Fashion Technology, Ministry of Education, Donghua University, Shanghai, 201620, China. daweili@dhu.edu.cn.
Yongchang WeiCollege of Information Sciences and Technology, Donghua University, Shanghai, 201620, China.
Rongsheng ZhuCollege of Arts and Sciences, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China No. 2021YFD120160204Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province No. LH2021C021Research and Application of Key Technologies for Intelligent Farming Decision Platform of Heilongjiang Province of China No. 2021ZXJ05A03Shanghai Rising-Star Program No. 21QA1400100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 3D crop data obtained during cultivation is of great significance to screening excellent varieties in modern breeding and improvement on crop yield. With the rapid development of deep learning, researchers have been making innovations in aspects of both data preparation and deep network design for segmenting plant organs from 3D data. Training of the deep learning network requires the input point cloud to have a fixed scale, which means all point clouds in the batch should have similar scale and contain the same number of points. A good down-sampling strategy can reduce the impact of noise and meanwhile preserve the most important 3D spatial structures. As far as we know, this work is the first comprehensive study of the relationship between multiple down-sampling strategies and the performances of popular networks for plant point clouds. Five down-sampling strategies (including FPS, RS, UVS, VFPS, and 3DEPS) are cross evaluated on five different segmentation networks (including PointNet +  + , DGCNN, PlantNet, ASIS, and PSegNet). The overall experimental results show that currently there is no strict golden rule on fixing down-sampling strategy for a specific mainstream crop deep learning network, and the optimal down-sampling strategy may vary on different networks. However, some general experience for choosing an appropriate sampling method for a specific network can still be summarized from the qualitative and quantitative experiments. First, 3DEPS and UVS are easy to generate better results on semantic segmentation networks. Second, the voxel-based down-sampling strategies may be more suitable for complex dual-function networks. Third, at 4096-point resolution, 3DEPS usually has only a small margin compared with the best down-sampling strategy at most cases, which means 3DEPS may be the most stable strategy across all compared. This study not only helps to further improve the accuracy of point cloud deep learning networks for crop organ segmentation, but also gives clue to the alignment of down-sampling strategies and a specific network.

Indexed as

3D crop dataCrop organ segmentationDeep learningPlant phenotypingPoint cloud down-sampling

Identifiers

PMID37951912
PMCPMC10640751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.