ArticlePlant methods2023
A comparative study on point cloud down-sampling strategies for deep learning-based crop organ segmentation.
Article in Plant methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Survey of Environmental Perception for Unmanned Ground Agricultural Machinery in Field Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 3D point cloud driven organ semantic segmentation to assess maize structural responses along the planting-density gradient.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Vision-Based Artificial Intelligence for Adaptive Peen Forming: Sensing Architectures, Learning Models, and Closed-Loop Smart Manufacturing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cotton field population phenotyping analysis based on 3D Gaussian reconstruction and dynamic spatial constraints.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Deep learning for three-dimensional (3D) plant phenomics.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Enhancing Digital Twin Fidelity Through Low-Discrepancy Sequence and Hilbert Curve-Driven Point Cloud Down-Sampling.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- 3D-NOD: 3D new organ detection in plant growth by a spatiotemporal point cloud deep segmentation framework.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Apnet: Lightweight network for apricot tree disease and pest detection in real-world complex backgrounds.Plant methods · 2025Article
- GCASSN: a graph convolutional attention synergistic segmentation network for 3D plant point cloud segmentation.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 3D crop data obtained during cultivation is of great significance to screening excellent varieties in modern breeding and improvement on crop yield. With the rapid development of deep learning, researchers have been making innovations in aspects of both data preparation and deep network design for segmenting plant organs from 3D data. Training of the deep learning network requires the input point cloud to have a fixed scale, which means all point clouds in the batch should have similar scale and contain the same number of points. A good down-sampling strategy can reduce the impact of noise and meanwhile preserve the most important 3D spatial structures. As far as we know, this work is the first comprehensive study of the relationship between multiple down-sampling strategies and the performances of popular networks for plant point clouds. Five down-sampling strategies (including FPS, RS, UVS, VFPS, and 3DEPS) are cross evaluated on five different segmentation networks (including PointNet + + , DGCNN, PlantNet, ASIS, and PSegNet). The overall experimental results show that currently there is no strict golden rule on fixing down-sampling strategy for a specific mainstream crop deep learning network, and the optimal down-sampling strategy may vary on different networks. However, some general experience for choosing an appropriate sampling method for a specific network can still be summarized from the qualitative and quantitative experiments. First, 3DEPS and UVS are easy to generate better results on semantic segmentation networks. Second, the voxel-based down-sampling strategies may be more suitable for complex dual-function networks. Third, at 4096-point resolution, 3DEPS usually has only a small margin compared with the best down-sampling strategy at most cases, which means 3DEPS may be the most stable strategy across all compared. This study not only helps to further improve the accuracy of point cloud deep learning networks for crop organ segmentation, but also gives clue to the alignment of down-sampling strategies and a specific network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.