ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2024
Updated Trends in the Utilization of Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer in the United States: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results Study.
Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing brachytherapy: The GEC-ESTRO strategic vision.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027Article
- Long-term results of stereotactic body radiotherapy boost in patients with cervical cancer considered unsuitable for intracavitary brachytherapy.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessing predictors of brachytherapy utilization among cervical cancer patients in Nigeria: evidence from a tertiary cancer centre.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Development of a virtual phantom for HDR cervical cancer brachytherapy: A multi-institutional tool for training, quality assurance, and variability reduction.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Feasibility of online adaptive SBRT boost with 1.5-T MR-Linac for cervical cancer patients unsuitable for brachytherapy: a planning study.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Trends in brachytherapy utilization in Canada from 2011 to 2020.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Update of incidence and survival in patients with cervical cancer in the United States from 2000 to 2021.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- Treatment delay and prolongation in locally advanced cervical cancer.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Article
- A new hyaluronate gel spacer and injection technique for cervical cancer brachytherapy: a technical report.Journal of radiation research · 2025Article
- Prognostic Significance of Nomogram and T-Score in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Chemoradiotherapy and Image-Guided Brachytherapy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Analysis of treatment planning time and optimization parameters for inverse planning for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy in uterine cervical cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Machine learning and deep learning to improve overall survival prediction in cervical cancer patients.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Implementing treatment according to the guidelines is of paramount importance in locally advanced cervical cancer: a real-world study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Unlocking economic gains: the impact of image-guided brachytherapy on cervical cancer treatment in Thailand.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Trends in brachytherapy in utilization for vaginal cancer in the United States from 2004 to 2021.Gynecologic oncology · 2024Article
- Freiburg flap used as vaginal applicator with/without free-hand interstitial needles in three-dimensional high-dose-rate brachytherapy for vaginal stump recurrence of cervical cancer.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOur previous Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) study revealed a concerning decline in brachytherapy utilization in the United States between 1988 and 2009. This study evaluates recent trends in brachytherapy utilization in cervical cancer and identifies factors and survival benefit associated with the use of brachytherapy treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using SEER data, 8500 patients with International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians 2009 stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) between 2000 and 2020 were identified. Logistic regression analysis was performed on potential factors associated with brachytherapy use: age, marital status, race, ethnicity, income, metropolitan status, year of diagnosis, SEER region, histology, grade, and stage. To adjust for differences between patients who received brachytherapy and those who did not, propensity-score matching was used. Multivariable Cox regression analysis assessed the association of brachytherapy use with cervical cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM) in the matched cohort.
resultsSixty-four percent of the 8500 women received brachytherapy in combination with EBRT; 36% received EBRT alone. The brachytherapy utilization rate declined sharply in 2003/2004 (lowest rate 44% in 2003) and then gradually improved especially in 2018 to 2020 (76%). Factors associated with higher odds of brachytherapy use included younger age, married (vs single), later years of diagnosis, certain SEER regions, and earlier stage. In the propensity-score matched cohort, brachytherapy treatment was associated with lower 4-year cumulative incidence of cancer death (32.1% vs 43.4%; P < .001) and better overall survival (64.0% vs 51.4%; P < .001). Brachytherapy treatment was independently associated with lower CSM (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.64-0.76; P < .001) and ACM (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67-0.78; P < .001).
conclusionsBrachytherapy utilization among SEER regions has improved since 2004 in patients with stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer. Brachytherapy use remains independently associated with significantly lower CSM and ACM and is an essential component of treatment for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.