ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2023
SMG: self-supervised masked graph learning for cancer gene identification.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disentangling Heterogeneous Molecular Networks for Multi-Omics-Driven Cancer Driver Discovery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A Novel Cancer Driver Genes Identification Method Based on Self-Supervised Dual Masked Graph Autoencoder.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- An overview of self-supervised deep learning applications to molecular data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Graph Neural Networks for Medical Imaging Analysis and Biological Data: Integrating Topology, Geometry, Radiomics, and Generative AI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Precision oncology in the age of AI: lessons from AI-driven drug discovery and clinical translation.BJC reports · 2026Review
- Integrative Analysis Reveals Genes Causal Relation with Ovarian Cancer and aging.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Deep graph convolutional network-based multi-omics integration for cancer driver gene identification.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Recent advances in deep learning for protein-protein interaction: a review.BioData mining · 2025Review
- Towards simplified graph neural networks for identifying cancer driver genes in heterophilic networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- SSCI: Self-Supervised Deep Learning Improves Network Structure for Cancer Driver Gene Identification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer genomics is dedicated to elucidating the genes and pathways that contribute to cancer progression and development. Identifying cancer genes (CGs) associated with the initiation and progression of cancer is critical for characterization of molecular-level mechanism in cancer research. In recent years, the growing availability of high-throughput molecular data and advancements in deep learning technologies has enabled the modelling of complex interactions and topological information within genomic data. Nevertheless, because of the limited labelled data, pinpointing CGs from a multitude of potential mutations remains an exceptionally challenging task. To address this, we propose a novel deep learning framework, termed self-supervised masked graph learning (SMG), which comprises SMG reconstruction (pretext task) and task-specific fine-tuning (downstream task). In the pretext task, the nodes of multi-omic featured protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are randomly substituted with a defined mask token. The PPI networks are then reconstructed using the graph neural network (GNN)-based autoencoder, which explores the node correlations in a self-prediction manner. In the downstream tasks, the pre-trained GNN encoder embeds the input networks into feature graphs, whereas a task-specific layer proceeds with the final prediction. To assess the performance of the proposed SMG method, benchmarking experiments are performed on three node-level tasks (identification of CGs, essential genes and healthy driver genes) and one graph-level task (identification of disease subnetwork) across eight PPI networks. Benchmarking experiments and performance comparison with existing state-of-the-art methods demonstrate the superiority of SMG on multi-omic feature engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.