ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024
Assessment of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Agreement Between Echocardiography and Cardiac MRI in Assessing Function, Strain, and Fibrosis in Pediatric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Preliminary Study.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Concurrent Use of Tafamidis and Mavacamten for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis With Severe Outflow Tract Obstruction.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Interventricular Septal Involvement Is Associated with More Impaired Ventricular Function and Mechanics in Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) each confer adverse prognosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Despite their prevalence, data on GLS in co-existent HCM and CAD is lacking. Ninety-six patients with HCM and CAD were retrospectively identified between 2005 and 2021, and analyzed using 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography. Obstructive and non-obstructive CAD patients were compared, multivariate linear regression tested associations between clinical and echocardiographic variables with GLS, and Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve assessed the utility of GLS to predict all-cause mortality at follow-up. Mean age was 71 ± 12.2 years, 41% had obstructive HCM, 78% had obstructive CAD, and 75% had prior acute coronary syndrome. At 4.8-year follow-up, GLS decreased compared with baseline (- 12.5 ± 4.5 vs. - 14 ± 4.2%, p = 0.007), with basal segments experiencing the greatest impairment. GLS was lower in obstructive versus non-obstructive CAD patients at follow-up, although the magnitude was attenuated (baseline: - 13.2 vs. - 17.1%, p < 0.001; follow-up: - 12 vs. - 14.1%, p = 0.05). Interventricular septal thickness (β = 0.54), apical HCM (β = 0.48), and right ventricular systolic pressure (β = 0.39) were associated with more impaired GLS (all p < 0.001), independent of obstructive CAD (β = 0.09, p = 0.44). There were 9 follow-up deaths, with baseline GLS > - 13.5% being a good predictor of all-cause mortality (AUC 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.92, sensitivity 88%, specificity 57%, p = 0.01). Patients with HCM and CAD experience progressive GLS impairment over long-term follow-up, with GLS > - 13.5% appearing to be a threshold for predicting all-cause mortality. Apical HCM phenotype is independently associated with worse GLS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.