Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37950755›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024

Central subfield thickness predicts visual acuity outcomes in plaque-irradiated eyes with choroidal melanoma.

Saumya M Shah, Laurel B Tanke, Christopher L Deufel, Ivy A Petersen, Kimberly S Corbin, David O Hodge, Timothy W Olsen, Lauren A Dalvin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 71% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saumya M ShahDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Laurel B TankeMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Christopher L DeufelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Ivy A PetersenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Kimberly S CorbinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
David O HodgeDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Timothy W OlsenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Lauren A DalvinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. dalvin.lauren@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9710-4284
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002379 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NILUFER ERTEKIN-TANER · 2017 to 2026
$14.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the association between pre-operative central subfield thickness (CST) and post-radiotherapy visual acuity (VA), cystoid macular edema (CME), and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) requirement.

designSingle-center retrospective study.

participantsPatients with plaque-irradiated extramacular choroidal melanoma treated between 11/11/2011 and 4/30/2021. Pre-operative CST difference between the affected and unaffected eye was used. Kaplan-Meier analysis and hazard ratios were calculated.

resultsOf 85 patients, pre-operative CST was greater in the melanoma-affected eye (vs. fellow eye) by mean of 20.4 μm (median 14.0, range - 60.0-182.0). Greater CST at presentation (vs. fellow eye) was associated with larger tumor diameter (p = 0.02), greater tumor thickness (p < 0.001), and more frequent tumor-related Bruch's membrane rupture (p = 0.006). On univariate analysis of outcome data, greater CST at presentation (vs. fellow eye) was associated with higher 5-year risk (1.09 [1.02-1.17], p = 0.02) of VA 20/200 or worse and increased (1.10 [1.01-1.20], p = 0.03) likelihood for anti-VEGF injections after plaque irradiation. There was no significant association with CME. The association between CST and VA outcome remained significant on multivariate analysis accounting for impact of tumor thickness and radiation dose to optic disc, while tumor distance to fovea was the only significant factor on multivariate analysis for anti-VEGF injections.

conclusionGreater CST at presentation (vs. fellow eye) was associated with worse VA outcome following plaque radiotherapy for choroidal melanoma. Large-sized tumors may contribute to a higher intraocular VEGF burden, potentially leading to greater preoperative CST, which correlates with poor VA outcome post-plaque radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Choroid NeoplasmsMacular EdemaMelanomaUveal NeoplasmsAngiogenesis InhibitorsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceUveal MelanomaVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVisual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AChoroidCystoid macular edemaMelanomaPlaque radiotherapyTumorUvea

Identifiers

PMID37950755
PMCPMC13264507
OpenAlexW4388586348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.