Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37950338›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2023

AMEERA-4: a randomized, preoperative window-of-opportunity study of amcenestrant versus letrozole in early breast cancer.

Mario Campone, François-Clément Bidard, Patrick Neven, Lei Wang, Bin Ling, Yvonne Dong, Gautier Paux, Christina Herold, Ugo De Giorgi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04191382 (Phase 2 Window Study of Two Dose Levels of Amcenestrant [SAR439859]), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04191382 phase2terminatednot on this map

Phase 2 Window Study of Two Dose Levels of Amcenestrant [SAR439859] (SERD) Versus Letrozole in Newly Diagnosed Pre-operative Post-menopausal Patients With ER Positive, HER2 Negative Primary Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2020 to 2021Enrolled105ConditionsBreast CancerArmsAmcenestrant (SAR439859), Letrozole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Mario CamponeInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, René Gauducheau, Boulevard Jacques Monod, 44805, Saint-Herblain, France. mario.campone@ico.unicancer.fr.
François-Clément BidardInstitut Curie, Paris and Saint-Cloud, France.
Patrick NevenDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Multidisciplinary Breast Center, University Hospitals Louvain, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Lei WangSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Bin LingSanofi, Shanghai, China.
Yvonne DongSanofi, Beijing, China.
Gautier PauxSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Christina HeroldSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ugo De GiorgiDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Sanofi (United States) · USSanofi (China) · CNInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWindow-of-opportunity (WOO) studies provide insights into the clinical activity of new drugs in breast cancer.

methodsAMEERA-4 (NCT04191382) was a WOO study undertaken to compare the pharmacodynamic effects of amcenestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader, with those of letrozole in postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed, operable estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) breast cancer. Women were randomized (1:1:1) to receive amcenestrant 400 mg, amcenestrant 200 mg, or letrozole 2.5 mg once daily for 14 days before breast surgery. The primary endpoint was change in Ki67 between baseline and Day 15 (i.e., day of surgery).

resultsEnrollment was stopped early because of slow recruitment, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The modified intent-to-treat population consisted of 95 study participants with baseline and post-treatment Ki67 values, whereas the safety population included 104 participants who had received at least one dose of study medication. Relative change from baseline in Ki67 was - 75.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] - 81.9 to - 67.9) for amcenestrant 400 mg, - 68.2% (- 75.7 to - 58.4) for amcenestrant 200 mg, and - 77.7% (- 83.4 to - 70.0) for letrozole (geometric least-squares mean [LSM] estimates). Absolute change in ER H-score from baseline (LSM estimate) was - 176.7 in the amcenestrant 400 mg arm, - 202.9 in the amcenestrant 200 mg arm, and - 32.5 in the letrozole arm. There were no Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events.

conclusionsBoth amcenestrant and letrozole demonstrated antiproliferative activity in postmenopausal women with previously untreated, operable ER+/HER2- breast cancer and had good overall tolerability.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04191382 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04191382 . Registered 9 December 2019.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenLetrozolePandemicsReceptors, EstrogenErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKi-67 AntigenLetrozoleReceptors, EstrogenAmcenestrantEarly breast cancerKi67PostmenopausalWindow-of-opportunity study

Identifiers

PMID37950338
PMCPMC10638815
OpenAlexW4388564297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.