Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37950243›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Partnering for change (P4C) in Sweden- a study protocol of a collaborative school-based service delivery model to create inclusive learning environments.

Vedrana B Baric, Moa Yngve, Marie Holmefur, Inna Feldman, Jenny Wilder, Kine Johansen, Nina Klang, Helene Lidström, Maria Borgestig

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05435937 (Partnering for Change), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05435937 naunknown statusnot on this map

Partnering for Change (P4C) in Sweden - an Intersectional Collaborative Intervention to Create an Inclusive Learning Environment and Increased Conditions for Learning for Pupils at Risk of Unhealth, Exclusion and Low Academic Achievements

TypeinterventionalSponsorLinkoeping UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled400ConditionsChild HealthArmsPartnering for change (P4C-Swe), Treatment as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vedrana B BaricDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. vedrana.baric@liu.se.ORCID 0000-0003-1795-7530
Moa YngveDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1073-1977
Marie HolmefurSchool of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5418-3154
Inna FeldmanDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3329-6066
Jenny WilderDepartment of Special Education, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9273-2203
Kine JohansenDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nina KlangDepartment of Education, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0027-084X
Helene LidströmDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1545-3876
Maria BorgestigDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7704-6232
Uppsala University · SELinköping University · SEÖrebro University · SEStockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInclusive learning environments are considered as crucial for children's engagement with learning and participation in school. Partnering for change (P4C) is a collaborative school-based service delivery model where services are provided at three levels of intensity based on children's needs (class, group-, individual interventions). Interventions in P4C are provided universally to support all children with learning, not only children with special education needs (SEN), and as such are expected to be health-promoting.

aimThe aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of P4C as well as school staff members' and children's experiences after P4C.

methodsIn a parallel, non-randomised controlled intervention design, 400 children, aged 6-12 years, and their teachers, will be recruited to either intervention classes, working according to the P4C, or to control classes (allocation ratio 1:1). Data will be collected at baseline, post-intervention (4 months), and 11 months follow-up post baseline. The primary outcome is children's engagement with learning in school. Secondary outcomes include for example children's health-related quality of life and wellbeing, occupational performance in school, attendance, and special educational needs. The difference-in-differences method using regression modelling will be applied to evaluate any potential changes following P4C. Focus group interviews focusing on children, and professionals' experiences will be performed after P4C. A health economic evaluation of P4C will be performed, both in the short term (post intervention) and the long term (11-month follow-up). This study will provide knowledge about the effectiveness of P4C on children's engagement with learning, mental health, and wellbeing, when creating inclusive learning environments using a combination of class-, group- and individual-level interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05435937.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSchoolsChildHumansLearningSchool Health ServicesSwedenChildren with special needsDynamic performance analysis (DPA)Inclusive learning environmentsMental healthPartnering for change (P4C)Response to intervention (RtI)School-based service delivery model

Identifiers

PMID37950243
PMCPMC10636854
OpenAlexW4388572080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.