ArticleBMC cancer2023
MRI-based automatic identification and segmentation of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using deep learning network.
Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning model for automated identification of ventrally positioned right hepatic artery in contrast-enhanced computed tomography of pediatric congenital biliary dilatation: development and clinical application.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- MRI In Vivo Detection of Amyloid-β Protein Deposition in Different Brain Regions of Patients with AD and MCI.Brain topography · 2026Article
- Deep learning segmentation of paediatric brain tumours using diffusion-weighted MRI: towards an early,Brain communications · 2026Article
- Advances in Endoscopic Diagnosis and Management of Cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrating quantitative DCE-MRI parameters and radiomic features for improved IDH mutation prediction in gliomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Predicting survival rates: the power of prognostic nomograms in distal cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Preoperative assessment of longitudinal extent in hilar cholangiocarcinoma using noninvasive enhanced MR radiomics: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in biliary tract cancers.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate identification of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) from an image is challenging because of the small size and complex background structure. Therefore, considering the limitation of manual delineation, it's necessary to develop automated identification and segmentation methods for ECC. The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning approach for automatic identification and segmentation of ECC using MRI.
methodsWe recruited 137 ECC patients from our hospital as the main dataset (C1) and an additional 40 patients from other hospitals as the external validation set (C2). All patients underwent axial T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Manual delineations were performed and served as the ground truth. Next, we used 3D VB-Net to establish single-mode automatic identification and segmentation models based on T1WI (model 1), T2WI (model 2), and DWI (model 3) in the training cohort (80% of C1), and compared them with the combined model (model 4). Subsequently, the generalization capability of the best models was evaluated using the testing set (20% of C1) and the external validation set (C2). Finally, the performance of the developed models was further evaluated.
resultsModel 3 showed the best identification performance in the training, testing, and external validation cohorts with success rates of 0.980, 0.786, and 0.725, respectively. Furthermore, model 3 yielded an average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.922, 0.495, and 0.466 to segment ECC automatically in the training, testing, and external validation cohorts, respectively.
conclusionThe DWI-based model performed better in automatically identifying and segmenting ECC compared to T1WI and T2WI, which may guide clinical decisions and help determine prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.