Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37950173›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2023

Anti-microbial and anti-cancer efficacy of acetone extract of Rosa chinensis against resistant strain and lung cancer cell line.

Kalaivani Madhavaram Kuppusamy, Sivakumar Selvaraj, Pujithaa Singaravelu, Cordelia Mano John, Kalaiselvan Racheal, Keziaann Varghese, Dinesh Kaliyamoorthy, Elumalai Perumal, Krishnamoorthy Gunasekaran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Screening of the anti-Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kalaivani Madhavaram KuppusamyResearch Centre for Cellular Genomics and Cancer Research, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, 600044, India.
Sivakumar SelvarajMolecular Biology section, Consultant Molecular Biologist, Medall Healthcare Private Limited, Chennai, India.
Pujithaa SingaraveluResearch Centre for Cellular Genomics and Cancer Research, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, 600044, India.
Cordelia Mano JohnDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.
Kalaiselvan RachealDepartment of Biotechnology, Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, India.
Keziaann VargheseDepartment of Biotechnology, Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, India.
Dinesh KaliyamoorthyDepartment of Microbiology, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, 600044, India.
Elumalai PerumalCentre for Global Health Research, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. elusandy@gmail.com.
Krishnamoorthy GunasekaranDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, College of Health Sciences, Dambi Dollo University, KelamWelega Zone, Dembidolo, P.O. Box: 360, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. krishnapdf2011@gmail.com.
Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital · INDr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute · INDambi Dollo UniversitySaveetha University · INSri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening of herbal plants for various therapeutic properties is the hour as it shows promising activity. Scientific evidence of the pharmacological activity of the plant strengthens the traditional application of plants.

methodsRose flowers (Rosa chinensis) were procured and grounded into a coarse powder. The DNA was isolated from rose flower and molecular identification was performed by rbcL-BF and rbcL-724R primers. Antibacterial activity was evaluated by using disc and agar diffusion methods and the anti-cancer effect of the rose flower extract (RE) was examined using MTT assay in lung cancer cell line. The mechanism of cell death induced by RE was qualitatively measured using Acridine orange/Ethidium bromide staining and Hoechst staining. GC-MS analysis was performed using GC-MS-5975C.

resultThe RE showed potent antimicrobial activity against various ATCC cultures. The rose extract strongly inhibits the growth of ESBL resistant organism along with inhibition of biofilm formation in the ESBL resistant organism. The extract caused apoptotic and necrotic cell death in lung cancer cells. GC-MS analysis demonstrated the presence of several biologically active compounds such as Clindamycin, Phytol, Octanoic acid, and Stigmasterol which might be the reason for the therapeutic properties of the plant.

conclusionThis study shows the antimicrobial and biofilm inhibition activity against the clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumonia. The study shows the cytotoxic and apoptotic activity in A549 cancer cell line. Thus, the plant may act as a potent antimicrobial drug against resistant strains.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsLung NeoplasmsRosaA549 CellsAcetoneHumansPlant ExtractsAcetoneAnti-Infective AgentsPlant ExtractsAnti-proliferative activityBiofilm inhibitionIn-vitro anti-bacterial activityRosa chinensis

Identifiers

PMID37950173
PMCPMC10636979
OpenAlexW4388568697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.