Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37950169›Full record

SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2023

Impact of a positive end-expiratory pressure strategy on oxygenation, respiratory compliance, and hemodynamics during laparoscopic surgery in non-obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Gulfairus A Yessenbayeva, Yekaterina A Yukhnevich, Zaukiya K Khamitova, Sergey I Kim, Murat B Zhumabayev, Gulbanu S Berdiyarova, Sanzhar B Shalekenov, Irina Y Mukatova, Andrey I Yaroshetskiy

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gulfairus A YessenbayevaNational Research Oncology Center, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-7841-1801
Yekaterina A YukhnevichKaraganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-5992-0336
Zaukiya K KhamitovaNational Research Oncology Center, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-2409-5644
Sergey I KimMultidisciplinary hospitals named after Professor H.J.Makazhanov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0003-4111-5517
Murat B ZhumabayevNational Research Oncology Center, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-2405-4447
Gulbanu S BerdiyarovaKazakh-Russian Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-2556-5123
Sanzhar B ShalekenovNational Research Oncology Center, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-3400-9823
Irina Y MukatovaAstana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-5804-8643
Andrey I YaroshetskiyPulmonology Department, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University, 8/2, Trubetskaya str. 119991, Moscow, Russia. dr.intensivist@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1484-092X
National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health · KZAstana Medical University · KZKaraganda Medical University · KZKazakhstan Medical University · KZSechenov University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during laparoscopic surgery may increase oxygenation and respiratory compliance. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the impact of different intraoperative PEEP strategies on arterial oxygenation, compliance, and hemodynamics during laparoscopic surgery in non-obese patients.

methodsWe searched RCTs in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from January 2012 to April 2022 comparing the different intraoperative PEEP (Low PEEP (LPEEP): 0-4 mbar; Moderate PEEP (MPEEP): 5-8 mbar; high PEEP (HPEEP): >8 mbar; individualized PEEP - iPEEP) on arterial oxygenation, respiratory compliance (Cdyn), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR). We calculated mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and predictive intervals (PI) using random-effects models. The Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool was applied.

results21 RCTs (n = 1554) met the inclusion criteria. HPEEP vs. LPEEP increased PaO

conclusionHPEEP and iPEEP during PNP in non-obese patients could promote oxygenation and increase Cdyn without clinically significant changes in MAP and HR. MPEEP could be insufficient to increase respiratory compliance and improve oxygenation. LPEEP may lead to decreased respiratory compliance and worsened oxygenation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42022362379; registered October 09, 2022.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRespiratory Distress SyndromeHemodynamicsHumansPositive-Pressure RespirationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicComplianceLaparoscopic SurgeryLung protective ventilationMeta-analysisNon-obeseOxygenationPEEPPneumoperitoneumPositive end-expiratory pressure

Identifiers

PMID37950169
PMCPMC10638810
OpenAlexW4388599268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.