Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37950165›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Women's experiences of social support during pregnancy: a qualitative systematic review.

Mona Al-Mutawtah, Emma Campbell, Hans-Peter Kubis, Mihela Erjavec

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06520930 (The Effect of the Structured Supportive Approach Based on Kolcaba Comfort Theory Applied to Primiparous Pregnant Women on the Comfort Level in the Last Trimester), which is not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06520930 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of the Structured Supportive Approach Based on Kolcaba Comfort Theory Applied to Primiparous Pregnant Women on the Comfort Level in the Last Trimester

TypeinterventionalSponsorSibel KucukRan2024 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsPrimipara PregnantArmsbreathing exercise therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Correlation between severe maternal morbidity and rates of living alone among mothers in the USA.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Co-Creating Preconception Health Content for a Digital Resource for Women From Diverse Ethnic Backgrounds.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mona Al-MutawtahSchool of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK. Mnl18pqc@bangor.ac.uk.
Emma CampbellSchool of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Hans-Peter KubisSchool of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Mihela ErjavecSchool of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial support during pregnancy can alleviate emotional and physical pressures, improving the well-being of mother and child. Understanding women's lived experiences and perceptions of social support during pregnancy is imperative to better support women. This systematic review explores and synthesises the qualitative research on women's experiences of social support during pregnancy.

methodsDatabases PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo and Scopus were searched with no year limit. Eligible studies included pregnant women or women who were up to one year postpartum and were assessed on their experiences of social support during pregnancy. The data were synthesised using the thematic synthesis approach.

resultsFourteen studies were included with data from 571 participating women across ten countries; two studies used focus groups, and 12 used interviews to collect their data. Four main themes were developed ('a variety of emotional support', 'tangible and intangible instrumental support', 'traditional rituals and spiritual support', and 'the all-encompassing natal home'), and six sub-themes ('female network connections', 'care and affection from the husband', 'dissatisfaction with relationships', 'financial support from the husband and family', 'practical support from family and friends', 'health information support').

conclusionsThis systematic review sheds light on women's experiences of social support during pregnancy. The results indicate a broad variety of emotional support experienced and valued by pregnant women from different sources. Additionally, women expressed satisfaction and dissatisfaction with tangible and intangible support forms. It was also highlighted that spirituality played an essential role in reducing stress and offering coping mechanisms for some, whereas spirituality increased stress levels for others.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeopleSocial SupportChildFemaleHumansMothersPostpartum PeriodPregnancyQualitative ResearchPregnancyQualitative researchSocial supportSystematic reviewThematic synthesis

Identifiers

PMID37950165
PMCPMC10638802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.