Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37950093›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2024

Integrating a microRNA signature as a liquid biopsy-based tool for the early diagnosis and prediction of potential therapeutic targets in pancreatic cancer.

Wenjie Shi, Thomas Wartmann, Sara Accuffi, Sara Al-Madhi, Aristotelis Perrakis, Christoph Kahlert, Alexander Link, Marino Venerito, Verena Keitel-Anselmino, Christiane Bruns and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Challenges of early detection of pancreatic cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wenjie Shi *Molecular and Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Magdeburg, Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant- Surgery, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Thomas Wartmann *Molecular and Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Magdeburg, Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant- Surgery, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Sara AccuffiMolecular and Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Magdeburg, Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant- Surgery, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Sara Al-MadhiMolecular and Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Magdeburg, Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant- Surgery, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Aristotelis PerrakisMolecular and Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Magdeburg, Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant- Surgery, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christoph KahlertDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander LinkDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Marino VeneritoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Verena Keitel-AnselminoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christiane BrunsFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Roland S CronerMolecular and Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Magdeburg, Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant- Surgery, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Yue ZhaoFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. yue.zhao@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6790-3402
Ulf D KahlertMolecular and Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Magdeburg, Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant- Surgery, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. ulf.kahlert@med.ovgu.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6021-1841
University Hospital Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive cancer, and early diagnosis significantly improves patient prognosis due to the early implementation of curative-intent surgery. Our study aimed to implement machine-learning algorithms to aid in early pancreatic cancer diagnosis based on minimally invasive liquid biopsies. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe analysis data were derived from nine public pancreatic cancer miRNA datasets and two sequencing datasets from 26 pancreatic cancer patients treated in our medical center, featuring small RNAseq data for patient-matched tumor and non-tumor samples and serum. Upon batch-effect removal, systematic analyses for differences between paired tissue and serum samples were performed. The robust rank aggregation (RRA) algorithm was used to reveal feature markers that were co-expressed by both sample types. The repeatability and real-world significance of the enriched markers were then determined by validating their expression in our patients' serum. The top candidate markers were used to assess the accuracy of predicting pancreatic cancer through four machine learning methods. Notably, these markers were also applied for the identification of pancreatic cancer and pancreatitis. Finally, we explored the clinical prognostic value, candidate targets and predict possible regulatory cell biology mechanisms involved.

resultsOur multicenter analysis identified hsa-miR-1246, hsa-miR-205-5p, and hsa-miR-191-5p as promising candidate serum biomarkers to identify pancreatic cancer. In the test dataset, the accuracy values of the prediction model applied via four methods were 94.4%, 84.9%, 82.3%, and 83.3%, respectively. In the real-world study, the accuracy values of this miRNA signatures were 82.3%, 83.5%, 79.0%, and 82.2. Moreover, elevated levels of these miRNAs were significant indicators of advanced disease stage and allowed the discrimination of pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer with an accuracy rate of 91.5%. Elevated expression of hsa-miR-205-5p, a previously undescribed blood marker for pancreatic cancer, is associated with negative clinical outcomes in patients.

conclusionA panel of three miRNAs was developed with satisfactory statistical and computational performance in real-world data. Circulating hsa-miRNA 205-5p serum levels serve as a minimally invasive, early detection tool for pancreatic cancer diagnosis and disease staging and might help monitor therapy success.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreatitisEarly Detection of CancerHumansLiquid BiopsyMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID37950093
PMCPMC10781694
OpenAlexW4388573997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.