Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37950069›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2024

What it takes to reduce sitting at work: a pilot study on the effectiveness and correlates of a multicomponent intervention.

Jannik Porath, Laura I Schmidt, Juliane Möckel, Chiara Dold, Lisa Hennerkes, Alexander Haussmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Perception and acceptance of a multicomponent routine program of active breaks for office workers.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jannik PorathInstitute of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7492-5810
Laura I SchmidtInstitute of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8750-9242
Juliane MöckelDepartment for Prevention and Health Promotion, Heidelberg University of Education, Heidelberg, Germany.
Chiara DoldDepartment for Prevention and Health Promotion, Heidelberg University of Education, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lisa HennerkesInstitute of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander HaussmannInstitute of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. alexander.haussmann@nct-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8586-3301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the feasibility and effects of a simple-to-implement multicomponent intervention to reduce sedentary time of office workers.

methodsSix groups of eight to ten office workers took part in the two-week Leicht Bewegt intervention. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline (T0, n = 52), after 2 weeks (T1, n = 46), and after 5 weeks (T2, n = 38), including subjective sedentary measures and social-cognitive variables based on the health action process approach (HAPA). Objective sedentary measures were obtained using activPAL trackers.

resultsThe intention to reduce sedentary behavior during work increased significantly from T0 to T1. Participants' objective and subjective sitting time decreased significantly from T0 to T1, corresponding to an average decrease per 8-h-workday of 55 min (d = - .66) or 74 min (d = - 1.14), respectively. This reduction persisted (for subjective sitting time) at T2 (d = - 1.08). Participants indicated a high satisfaction with the intervention.

conclusionsThe Leicht Bewegt intervention offers a feasible and effective opportunity to reduce sedentary behavior at work. Randomized controlled trials including longer follow-up time periods are needed to validate its benefits in different workplaces.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthSitting PositionHumansPilot ProjectsSedentary BehaviorTime FactorsWorkplaceHealth action process approachHealth behavior changeMulticomponent interventionOccupational healthSedentary behaviorWorkplace intervention

Identifiers

PMID37950069
PMCPMC10791766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.