Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37950041›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Comparative performance analysis of binary variants of FOX optimization algorithm with half-quadratic ensemble ranking method for thyroid cancer detection.

Rohit Sharma, Gautam Kumar Mahanti, Ganapati Panda, Adyasha Rath, Sujata Dash, Saurav Mallik, Zhongming Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rohit SharmaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, NIT, Durgapur, 713209, India.
Gautam Kumar MahantiDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, NIT, Durgapur, 713209, India.
Ganapati PandaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, C.V. Raman Global University, Bhubaneswar, 752054, India.
Adyasha RathDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, C.V. Raman Global University, Bhubaneswar, 752054, India.
Sujata DashDepartment of Information Technology, Nagaland University, Dimapur, India.
Saurav MallikDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. sauravmtech2@gmail.com.
Zhongming ZhaoCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Zhongming.Zhao@uth.tmc.edu.

Funding

Transforming dbGaP genetic and genomic data to FAIR-ready by artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithmsR01LM012806 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Zhongming Zhao · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
Deep learning for decoding genetic regulation and cellular maps in craniofacial developmentR01DE030122 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI IWATA, JUNICHI, ZHAO, ZHONGMING · 2021 to 2023
$1.7M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE030122NIH HHS R01DE030122NIH HHS R01LM012806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thyroid cancer is a life-threatening condition that arises from the cells of the thyroid gland located in the neck's frontal region just below the adam's apple. While it is not as prevalent as other types of cancer, it ranks prominently among the commonly observed cancers affecting the endocrine system. Machine learning has emerged as a valuable medical diagnostics tool specifically for detecting thyroid abnormalities. Feature selection is of vital importance in the field of machine learning as it serves to decrease the data dimensionality and concentrate on the most pertinent features. This process improves model performance, reduces training time, and enhances interpretability. This study examined binary variants of FOX-optimization algorithms for feature selection. The study employed eight transfer functions (S and V shape) to convert the FOX-optimization algorithms into their binary versions. The vision transformer-based pre-trained models (DeiT and Swin Transformer) are used for feature extraction. The extracted features are transformed using locally linear embedding, and binary FOX-optimization algorithms are applied for feature selection in conjunction with the Naïve Bayes classifier. The study utilized two datasets (ultrasound and histopathological) related to thyroid cancer images. The benchmarking is performed using the half-quadratic theory-based ensemble ranking technique. Two TOPSIS-based methods (H-TOPSIS and A-TOPSIS) are employed for initial model ranking, followed by an ensemble technique for final ranking. The problem is treated as multi-objective optimization task with accuracy, F2-score, AUC-ROC and feature space size as optimization goals. The binary FOX-optimization algorithm based on the [Formula: see text] transfer function achieved superior performance compared to other variants using both datasets as well as feature extraction techniques. The proposed framework comprised a Swin transformer to extract features, a Fox optimization algorithm with a V1 transfer function for feature selection, and a Naïve Bayes classifier and obtained the best performance for both datasets. The best model achieved an accuracy of 94.75%, an AUC-ROC value of 0.9848, an F2-Score of 0.9365, an inference time of 0.0353 seconds, and selected 5 features for the ultrasound dataset. For the histopathological dataset, the diagnosis model achieved an overall accuracy of 89.71%, an AUC-ROC score of 0.9329, an F2-Score of 0.8760, an inference time of 0.05141 seconds, and selected 12 features. The proposed model achieved results comparable to existing research with small features space.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsThyroid NeoplasmsBayes TheoremHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID37950041
PMCPMC10638362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.