Trial reportEye (London, England)2024
Risk factors for corneal abrasions in Nepal: a community-based study.
Trial report in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- OCT angiography 2023 update: focus on diabetic retinopathy.Acta diabetologica · 2024Review
- Associations between retinal microvascular flow, geometry, and progression of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes: a 2-year longitudinal study.Acta diabetologica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSouth Asia is experiencing rapid urbanization, which may be changing the risk factor profile for ocular trauma. The objective of this study was to compare risk factors for traumatic corneal abrasions in rural versus urban Nepal, and to assess if any risk factors were associated with a poor outcome.
methodsIn a prospective, cross-sectional, community-based study performed as part of a cluster-randomized trial, community health workers from Nepal were trained to diagnose and treat traumatic corneal abrasions. Participants with an abrasion were invited to complete a risk factor survey. The main exposure variable was the object of eye injury, stratified by rural-urban residence. The main outcome measure was a lack of corneal healing after a three-day course of antimicrobials.
resultsOf 3657 participants diagnosed with a corneal abrasion, 2265 completed a survey. Eye trauma occurred most frequently during agricultural activities. The most common object of injury was vegetative matter, accounting for approximately 40% of injuries in rural, peri-urban, and urban communities. Wood injuries were more common in rural communities (24%) compared with urban or peri-urban communities (13%). Eye injury from an animal was more likely to result in a non-healing corneal abrasion after 3 days of treatment compared with other types of trauma (prevalence ratio 2.59, 95%CI 1.16-5.76).
conclusionsHealth promotion activities for prevention of corneal ulcers in Nepal should focus on agricultural trauma in both rural and urban areas. Community members experiencing eye trauma from an animal may benefit from early referral to an eye clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.