Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37949606›Full record

ReviewPET clinics2024

Advances in Breast PET Instrumentation.

Srilalan Krishnamoorthy, Suleman Surti

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PET clinics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Srilalan KrishnamoorthyDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. Electronic address: srilalan@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Suleman SurtiDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Time-of-Flight PET for Improved Whole-Body ImagingR01CA113941 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JOEL S KARP, Suleman Surti · 2006 to 2026
$9.8M
High Performance, Quantitative Breast PET Scanner Integrated With TomosynthesisR01CA196528 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ANDREW DOUGLAS ARNOLD MAIDMENT, Suleman Surti · 2016 to 2026
$5.9M
Optimization of Clinical and Research PET ImagingR01EB028764 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SURTI, SULEMAN · 2020 to 2023
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA113941NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196528NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dedicated breast PET scanners currently have a spatial resolution in the 1.5 to 2 mm range, and the ability to provide tomographic images and quantitative data. They are also commercially available from a few vendors. A review of past and recent advances in the development and performance of dedicated breast PET scanners is summarized.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPositron-Emission TomographyBreast cancerBreast PETDedicated breast PETHigh spatial resolutionPEMPETPositron emission tomographySmall lesion

Identifiers

PMID37949606
PMCPMC10712960
OpenAlexW4388489411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.