ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2023
Formulation Graphs for Mapping Structure-Composition of Battery Electrolytes to Device Performance.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accelerating Electrolyte Discovery Using Generative Models and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Harnessing Li-Ion Binding Energy for Solvation-Guided Electrolyte Additive Design and Robust Solid Electrolyte Interphase Reinforcement.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Active learning accelerates electrolyte solvent screening for anode-free lithium metal batteries.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Self-Driving Laboratories for Chemistry and Materials Science.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- CALiSol-23: Experimental electrolyte conductivity data for various Li-salts and solvent combinations.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced computational methods are being actively sought to address the challenges associated with the discovery and development of new combinatorial materials, such as formulations. A widely adopted approach involves domain-informed high-throughput screening of individual components that can be combined together to form a formulation. This manages to accelerate the discovery of new compounds for a target application but still leaves the process of identifying the right "formulation" from the shortlisted chemical space largely a laboratory experiment-driven process. We report a deep learning model, the Formulation Graph Convolution Network (F-GCN), that can map the structure-composition relationship of the formulation constituents to the property of liquid formulation as a whole. Multiple GCNs are assembled in parallel that featurize formulation constituents domain-intuitively on the fly. The resulting molecular descriptors are scaled based on the respective constituent's molar percentage in the formulation, followed by integration into a combined formulation descriptor that represents the complete formulation to an external learning architecture. The use case of the proposed formulation learning model is demonstrated for battery electrolytes by training and testing it on two exemplary data sets representing electrolyte formulations vs battery performance: one data set is sourced from the literature about Li/Cu half-cells, while the other is obtained by lab experiments related to lithium-iodide full-cell chemistry. The model is shown to predict performance metrics such as Coulombic efficiency (CE) and specific capacity of new electrolyte formulations with the lowest reported errors. The best-performing F-GCN model uses molecular descriptors derived from molecular graphs (GCNs) that are informed with HOMO-LUMO and electric moment properties of the molecules using a knowledge transfer technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.