Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37948455›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2023

Social workers and acquired brain injury: A systematic review of the current evidence-base.

Mark A Linden, Mark Holloway, Claire Cooper, Akudo Amadiegwu, Caroline Bald, Michael Clark, Andy Mantell, Alyson Norman, Andrew Bateman

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mark A LindenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3832-4102
Mark HollowayHead First Assessment Rehabilitation and Case Management LLP, Cranbrook, United Kingdom.
Claire CooperSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5416-1411
Akudo AmadiegwuSchool of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Caroline BaldSchool of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Michael ClarkCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics & Political Science, London, United Kingdom.
Andy MantellThe Brain Injury Social Work Group, Maidstone, United Kingdom.
Alyson NormanSchool of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4332-6049
Andrew BatemanSchool of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2547-5921
University of Essex · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social work plays an important role in the assessment and treatment of people with acquired brain injury. Acquired brain injury is a complex and highly prevalent condition which can impact on cognitive, emotional and social domains. As acquired brain injury is a hidden disability it can be misdiagnosed or classified as another condition entirely. We sought to systematically explore the evidence base to examine how social workers have been prepared to work with their clients with brain injury. Employing six electronic databases (Social Policy & Practice, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus) we reviewed 1071 papers. After applying eligibility criteria 17 papers were included in this review. We utilised standardised data extraction and quality appraisal tools to assess all included papers. Following appraisal, 9 papers were judged as possessing high methodological quality whilst 8 were judged as medium. Employing narrative synthesis, we identified four themes which captured the key findings of these papers. Themes were named as (i) advocacy and social work (ii) training and multidisciplinary team working (iii) inclusion of social networks and (iv) societal barriers. In order to meet their statutory responsibilities to practice safely, social workers must receive training in how to identify ABI and develop understanding of its consequences and subsequent need for provision. Social workers are also in a unique position to advocate for their clients and should make every effort to ensure their needs are met.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesSocial WorkersEmploymentHumansSocial Work

Identifiers

PMID37948455
PMCPMC10637701
OpenAlexW4388563277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.