Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37948450›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

BayFlux: A Bayesian method to quantify metabolic Fluxes and their uncertainty at the genome scale.

Tyler W H Backman, Christina Schenk, Tijana Radivojevic, David Ando, Jahnavi Singh, Jeffrey J Czajka, Zak Costello, Jay D Keasling, Yinjie Tang, Elena Akhmatskaya and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. BayesianMetabolites · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tyler W H BackmanBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6056-353X
Christina SchenkBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Tijana RadivojevicBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
David AndoBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Jahnavi SinghDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Jeffrey J CzajkaDepartment of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Zak CostelloBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Jay D KeaslingBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Yinjie TangDepartment of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Elena AkhmatskayaBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Hector Garcia MartinBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4556-9685

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic fluxes, the number of metabolites traversing each biochemical reaction in a cell per unit time, are crucial for assessing and understanding cell function. 13C Metabolic Flux Analysis (13C MFA) is considered to be the gold standard for measuring metabolic fluxes. 13C MFA typically works by leveraging extracellular exchange fluxes as well as data from 13C labeling experiments to calculate the flux profile which best fit the data for a small, central carbon, metabolic model. However, the nonlinear nature of the 13C MFA fitting procedure means that several flux profiles fit the experimental data within the experimental error, and traditional optimization methods offer only a partial or skewed picture, especially in "non-gaussian" situations where multiple very distinct flux regions fit the data equally well. Here, we present a method for flux space sampling through Bayesian inference (BayFlux), that identifies the full distribution of fluxes compatible with experimental data for a comprehensive genome-scale model. This Bayesian approach allows us to accurately quantify uncertainty in calculated fluxes. We also find that, surprisingly, the genome-scale model of metabolism produces narrower flux distributions (reduced uncertainty) than the small core metabolic models traditionally used in 13C MFA. The different results for some reactions when using genome-scale models vs core metabolic models advise caution in assuming strong inferences from 13C MFA since the results may depend significantly on the completeness of the model used. Based on BayFlux, we developed and evaluated novel methods (P-13C MOMA and P-13C ROOM) to predict the biological results of a gene knockout, that improve on the traditional MOMA and ROOM methods by quantifying prediction uncertainty.

Indexed as

Metabolic Flux AnalysisModels, BiologicalBayes TheoremCarbon IsotopesUncertaintyCarbon-13Carbon Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID37948450
PMCPMC10664898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.