Trial reportMilitary medicine2023
Predictors of Sustained Response to Functional Restoration in a Military Population.
Trial report in Military medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe purpose of this study was to determine if improvement in pain impact and functional performance following a functional restoration (FR) program was sustained up to 6 months posttreatment and to identify predictors of sustained improvement. MATERIALS AND
methodsSecondary analysis of data collected during randomized clinical trial. Study population included 108 US active duty service members who completed an FR program, as well as 3- and/or 6-month follow-up assessments. Primary outcome measure was the NIH Research Task Force (pain) impact score (PIS). Secondary outcome was a composite functional performance measure of treadmill, lifting, and carrying tolerances. Variables analyzed to determine their predictive value included demographics; treatment hours; measures of pain intensity, function, mood, sleep, social satisfaction, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, self-efficacy, pain acceptance, patient activation, functional performance, and neuropathic pain.
resultsMean PIS and functional performance improved significantly immediately following FR, but after 6 months, only improvement in functional performance sustained. Responder analysis showed that 6 months after FR, 42% of participants reported improvement that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference in PIS or functional performance. Predictors of sustained PIS improvement included younger age, absence of neuropathic pain features, less self-rated disability, better baseline functional performance, and worse baseline PIS. Predictors of sustained functional performance improvement included more treatment hours, lower baseline pain catastrophizing, and lower baseline functional performance.
conclusionsThis study supports the investment of treatment time in FR to yield sustained clinically meaningful improvement, as observed in over 40% of this study's military participants. Pretreatment predictors of sustained response included lower pain catastrophizing and absence of neuropathic pain. Further research is needed to determine if treatments that improve pain catastrophizing and neuropathic pain will result in sustained improvement in pain impact and functional performance following FR program participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.