Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37947988›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2024

Evaluation of a smartphone electrocardiograph in healthy foals and comparison to standard base-apex electrocardiography.

Francesca Bindi, Tommaso Vezzosi, Giulia Sala, Francesca Freccero, Paola Marmorini, Francesca Bonelli, Micaela Sgorbini

Abstract readObservational Study, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison between a fitness tracker (EquimetreFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesca BindiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, via Livornese, San Piero a Grado, 56122, Italy.
Tommaso VezzosiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, via Livornese, San Piero a Grado, 56122, Italy. tommaso.vezzosi@unipi.it.
Giulia SalaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, via Livornese, San Piero a Grado, 56122, Italy.
Francesca FrecceroDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, 40064, Italy.
Paola MarmoriniPrivate Practitioner, Pisa, Italy.
Francesca BonelliDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, via Livornese, San Piero a Grado, 56122, Italy.
Micaela SgorbiniDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, via Livornese, San Piero a Grado, 56122, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smartphone-based technology for ECG recording has recently spread as a complementary tool for electrocardiographic screening and monitoring in adult horses and in other animal species. The present study aimed to assess the feasibility and accuracy of a smartphone-based ECG in healthy foals. This was a prospective observational study (authorization n. 45,865/2016) including 22 foals aged less than 21 days. A reference standard base-apex ECG (rECG) was acquired, and a smartphone ECG (sECG) was recorded immediately after by using a smartphone-based single lead electrocardiograph. All ECG tracings were evaluated in a blind fashion by a single board-certified cardiologist, who judged whether the tracings were acceptable for interpretation and performed ECG measurements and diagnosis. The Spearman correlation coefficient, the Cohen's k test and the Bland-Altman test were used to assess the agreement between sECG and rECG. All sECG tracings were acceptable for interpretation. All foals showed sinus rhythm on both rRCG and sECG tracings, with perfect agreement in heart rate classification (κ = 0.87; p < 0.001). No clinically relevant differences were found in the assessment of waves and intervals duration. Concerning P wave and QRS complex polarity, the percentage of agreement between rECG and sECG was 78% and 83%, respectively. About ECG tracing quality, rECG and sECG showed a substantial agreement (κ = 0.624; p < 0.001). In conclusion, the smartphone-based ECG device tested in the present study recorded good quality single-lead ECG tracings in foals, reliable for heart rate and ECG measurements, but different polarity of P waves and QRS complexes was found in some foals in comparison to rECG.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacHorse DiseasesSmartphoneAnimalsElectrocardiographyHeart RateHorsesProspective StudiesAccuracyCardiologyElectrocardiographyFeasibilityFoalSmartphone-based ECG

Identifiers

PMID37947988
PMCPMC10998801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.